Part of Federalist 41 concerns the military and how much power the government ought to have to pay for it.

FORBES: Move up http://i.forbesimg.com t Move down

But when concerns with those kinds of statements could no longer be ignored, DOD responded by issuing a narrowly focused, technocratic, and purely defensive position that fails to demonstrate any serious thinking about the nature of cyberpower and how it relates to the other elements of military and national power.

FORBES: DOD Cyber Strategy Remains Ambiguous on Threats and Responses

Gen Evren's indictment carries great symbolic significance in Turkey, our correspondent says, demonstrating how far the balance of power has shifted away from the once untouchable military establishment.

BBC: Turkey's 1980 military coup leaders stand trial

Today, we witnessed firsthand how the military and civilians are working to find better ways for America to manage their power and energy resources.

WHITEHOUSE: Champions of Secure Energy

But when public depictions are skewed toward lethal actions and fail to account for nuanced forms of power and deterrence, we undermine public discourse on how best to leverage military force for our national security.

CNN: Special ops bravado hurts national security

Similarly, a good cyber strategy will require a balance of offense and defense and, most importantly, a clear vision for how cyber power relates to and can work in concert with other types of power to meet military objectives and promote national interests.

FORBES: DOD Cyber Strategy Remains Ambiguous on Threats and Responses