-
The lawsuit claims the policy violates the Constitution's Fourth Amendment, which prohibits illegal searches and seizures, as well as the equal-protection clause of the 14th Amendment, which is often invoked to fight laws seen as racially discriminatory.
WSJ: Judicial Fixes Are Debated As Police-Stops Trial Ends
-
The Center for Constitutional Rights claims stop-and-frisk violates the Constitution's Fourth Amendment, which prohibits illegal searches and seizures as well as the equal-protection clause of the Fourteenth Amendment, which is often invoked to fight laws seen as racially discriminatory.
WSJ: Trial Begins Over NYPD's Frisk Policy
-
The Center for Constitutional Rights claims the stop-and-frisk policy violates the Constitution's Fourth Amendment, which prohibits illegal searches and seizures as well as the equal-protection clause of the Fourteenth Amendment, which is often invoked to fight laws seen as racially discriminatory.
WSJ: Stop-and-Frisk at Issue
-
The Center for Constitutional Rights, which brought the lawsuit on behalf of several individuals, claims the policy violates the Constitution's Fourth Amendment, which prohibits illegal searches and seizures, as well as the equal-protection clause of the Fourteenth Amendment, which is often invoked to fight laws seen as racially discriminatory.
WSJ: New York Police Use of Stop-and-Frisk Drops
-
The restrictions on a defendant's right to silence and the admission of evidence even from illegal police searches would seem outrageous.
ECONOMIST: And justice for au pairs
-
Follow-up searches uncovered 20, 000 litres of illegal fuel, the NIO said.
BBC: NEWS | UK | Northern Ireland | Clampdown on illegal fuel