-
After all, under the Japan-U.S. Defense Cooperation agreement, Japan's Self-Defense Forces would be allowed to engage for the first time in detailed planning with U.S. forces to meet a range of contingencies, including non-combat support, in the event of conflict in the East Asian region.
CNN: more stories
-
Such a step would allow Japan's Self-Defense Forces to launch a pre-emptive missile strike at an enemy's military target when an imminent attack on Japan from that specific site is confirmed, officials for the ruling Liberal Democratic Party said.
WSJ: Japan's Military Moves Toward Pre-Emptive Strike Capability
-
Article nine of the constitution forbids Japan's military -- the Self-Defense Forces -- from waging war overseas.
CNN: Japan ground troops set to leave
-
While the Japan Coast Guard is responsible for protecting Japan's coastlines, the defense minister can order the Self-Defense Forces to be deployed for maritime security operations if the situation is considered beyond the coast guard's capabilities.
WSJ: Japan on Alert Over Unidentified Submarines
-
After decades leading the opposition, Japan's Socialist Party, with its unrealistic calls for abolishing the Self-Defense Forces, has faded.
FORBES: On The Cover/Top Stories
-
At the heart of the debate is whether Japan should change Article 9, under which the nation has no armed forces beyond a self-defense force.
WSJ: Most Japanese Want Constitution Revised
-
That Japan and here I mean not just the Japan Democratic Party (DPJ) Noda cabinet, but also the ministry of foreign affairs (MOFA) and self-defense forces (SDF) bureaucracies, and, particularly, the factions within the main opposition Liberal Democratic Party (DPJ) and nationalists allied with former Tokyo major Ishihara Shintaro did not expect a ferocious response from China, including shows of naval force and threats of occupation, is not credible.
FORBES: Is Japan Risking War to Save the U.S.-Japan Alliance?