Modern portfolio theory advocates blending asset classes to maximize expected return and minimize portfolio volatility.
For advocates of Modern Portfolio Theory, this is confounding at worst and problematic at best.
"Conventional portfolio theory says not to hold all your eggs in one basket, " says Mr. Jacobs.
Yet the belief in Modern Portfolio Theory has remained robust amongst the investing public.
Modern portfolio theory dictates that to reap higher returns, investors must assume greater risk.
FORBES: Just Say No To Federal Bailouts Of State Pension Funds
The company says it uses modern portfolio theory to build an optimized allocation across six asset classes.
But this is the math behind modern portfolio theory (MPT) developed in the 1950s by Harry Markowitz.
Portfolio theory defines risk only as volatility, or the extent to which returns can vary from average.
Today modern portfolio theory is used to justify the inclusion of even the riskiest assets in significant percentages.
FutureAdvisor says it uses a mathematical optimization algorithm to apply modern portfolio theory principles to each person's portfolio.
In other words, Modern Portfolio Theory as an investment strategy is fundamentally incomplete.
In the early 1950s, another doctoral student named Harry Markowitz posited a statistical approach to investment selection called Modern Portfolio Theory.
FORBES: Wise Up: 'Normal' Market Behavior Is Not Normal But Crazy Is
As part of that effort, they published and widely circulated a study illustrating the benefits of foreign diversification using Modern Portfolio Theory.
Professionals are more likely to understand real-world limitations of Modern Portfolio Theory.
The performance bonus from minimizing risk for a given level of return (a key tenant of modern portfolio theory) has also been reduced.
FORBES: Benefits From Asset Allocation Are Harder To Come By
Yet if central banks were to build their reserves from scratch, portfolio theory would suggest that they should hold a much smaller share in gold.
His research interests include portfolio theory and retirement income planning.
We had a failure of typical modern portfolio theory allocation.
At the other end of the spectrum are proponents of modern portfolio theory and efficient markets, academicians like Burton Malkiel of Princeton University and Eugene Fama of The University of Chicago.
And although that may seem blindingly obvious to you now that you just read it, the entire edifice of Modern Portfolio Theory is based on ignoring the relationship between economics and finance.
FORBES: Interest Rates For Dummies: Solving The Interest-Rate Puzzle
The logic behind long-only equity, that risky assets deserve higher growth potential and straight market exposure will provide acceptable returns, works well in the ivory tower of modern portfolio theory, but often takes decades to deliver results in practice.
And to top it all off, Modern Portfolio Theory, which is drilled into the head of every finance major and, more to the point, every Certified Financial Analyst exam taker, tells them that finance has no discernible causal relationship with economics.
FORBES: Interest Rates For Dummies: Solving The Interest-Rate Puzzle
Anderson is a must read for anyone who wants to understand the economics and finance of that period, and anyone who, like me, is interested in learning the principles of classical finance, free from the distortions of Keynesianism and Modern Portfolio Theory.
But this one-size-fits-all portfolio does not agree with financial theory, which holds that each investor should take into account his or her individual economic situation.
The CAPM theory assumed that the portfolio would hold an amount of risk free assets plus it would embrace all risky assets weighted by their market capitalization.
When the stockmarket fell (as it did), so the theory goes, the portfolio investors would pile in, see Hong Kong shares climb again, and register a tidy capital gain before their year-end performance review.
The owners value shares at less than the proportional value of underlying assets on the theory that fractional interests in a portfolio are not worth as much to outsiders.
In theory, the tax-managed portfolio should prefer non-dividend payers.
FORBES: The Corporate Tax Debate? Ignore It and Think About Your Taxes
Translated into investment theory, this means investors should aim to hold a portfolio of assets whose returns are not highly correlated.
应用推荐