-
Lawyers representing Associated Newspapers, which also publishes the Mail on Sunday, challenged a ruling on the admissibility of anonymous evidence at London's High Court before Lord Justice Toulson, Mr Justice Sweeney and Mrs Justice Sharp.
BBC: Leveson Inquiry: Anonymous evidence ruling challenged
-
In a 5-4 ruling two weeks ago, both Mr Roberts and Mr Alito joined the majority in ruling that evidence seized after the police knocked on a door and waited only three to five seconds, rather than the standard 15-20 seconds, need not be excluded from a trial.
ECONOMIST: The Supreme Court
-
Mr Strine will hear more evidence on December 13th, and give his ruling within a few weeks.
ECONOMIST: Will Leo Strine re-engineer takeover law in America?
-
The appeals court reversed the ruling over decisions the trial judge made regarding evidence Roche could put on.
FORBES: Three Thousand Words Of Warnings Not Enough
-
The justices will review a ruling that threw out a drug-trafficking conviction based in part on GPS evidence regarding the suspect's whereabouts.
WSJ: Court to Review FCC Rules on Nudity, Profanity
-
If a doctor is acquitted of a criminal charge, the GMC accepts the court's ruling on the criminal matters - although it can launch its own investigation if evidence of other serious professional misconduct is uncovered during the trial.
BBC: Dealing with criminal doctors
-
Under the new bill, Mr Previti might be able to submit direct evidence to the supreme court, whose role is currently limited to ruling on points of law.
ECONOMIST: Italy's prime minister and the law
-
In a ruling on 9 November, Lord Justice Leveson said he would be "prepared to receive anonymous evidence".
BBC: Leveson Inquiry: Anonymous evidence ruling challenged
-
In a ruling on January 7th, Louis Pollak, a federal judge in Pennsylvania, decided that fingerprint evidence was unreliable.
ECONOMIST: Fingerprint evidence
-
On August 31st the department challenged a pre-trial ruling by the judge, who had demanded custody of all evidence and government documents relating to the case.
ECONOMIST: Government evasion