For the truth is that physicists are both bored and frustrated by the Standard Model.
With that, the economical explanation provided by the standard model would be blown apart.
This was the development of the current theory in the 1960s and 70s called the "Standard Model".
The Standard Model is a framework that explains how the known sub-atomic particles interact with each other.
The Standard Model allows a whiff of this, but nowhere near enough to explain matter's cosmic dominance.
But that difference still neatly fits within existing theory - the Standard Model - leaving a mystery unresolved.
One way to look beyond the Standard Model is to question the Higgs's status as an elementary particle.
ECONOMIST: The hunt for physics��s most elusive quarry is over
If neutrinos were truly massless, the standard model would predict that their flavours would be fixed for ever.
Since then, all the particles predicted by the Standard Model have been discovered - including most recently the Higgs.
These are like the particles in the Standard Model - but more massive.
The standard model of education is a passive one, where success is measured by memorizing rote facts, and figures.
The Standard Model of Particle Physics describes all the known properties of nature (with the exception of dark matter).
If found, these would be accepted by the Standard Model but would not strictly be a part of it.
The Higgs boson is of huge importance to the widely accepted theory of physics, known as the Standard Model.
What's more, physicists are still finalizing the standard model, the theory behind particles.
WSJ: The Weekend Interview with Michio Kaku: Captain Michio and the World of Tomorrow
Deviations from the Standard Model prediction, if they are confirmed by more data, can shed light on these unknowns.
But without data that deviate from the Standard Model's predictions, they cannot decide which of these models look correct.
The boson earned a nickname - the "God particle" - supposedly because of its importance to the Standard Model.
BBC: Peter Higgs: honour for physicist who proposed particle
But it may, just possibly, show that the standard model is fundamentally wrong.
The other, known as the Standard Model, deals with everything else more messily.
The Standard Model, though it has stood the test of time, is held together by a number of mathematical kludges.
The measured magnetic moment of the electron agrees with that predicted by the Standard Model to within four parts per billion.
Readers without a grasp of the so-called standard model in particle physics may well flounder in the chapter on the physics prize.
The Higgs boson is the only particle theorized by the standard model of physics that hasn't been conclusively observed in an experiment.
This is the mathematical afterthought to the main body of the Standard Model, and nobody knows for sure whether it actually exists.
ECONOMIST: Particle physics makes sense, but it assumes too much
The high-tech bins use solar power to compact materials, allowing them to hold up to eight times more rubbish than a standard model.
But scientists do not know if the particle they've found is truly the one predicted by the Standard Model of particle physics.
In addition, the standard model says the particle also should have positive parity, which is a measure of how its mirror image behaves.
According to the Standard Model, the matter and antimatter versions of these mesons should give birth to such daughters in the same proportions.
For example, the rate at which the new particle is produced seems to be slightly higher than the one predicted in the Standard Model.
应用推荐