这个论点存在着危险的循环论证。
我认为这很明显，它最终只是循环论证。
这大概是个循环论证。
这不是一个循环论证吗？
他回答说：“当然是循环论证，最好的论点都是循环论证。”
在本文中我的意图是界定一种可以避免此类循环论证的理性概念。
My intention in this paper is to attempt to define a conception of reasonableness which avoids this kind of circularity.
之所以出现这种冲突，是因为哈耶克的自由观和平等观陷入了循环论证的模式。
The reason why this kind of conflict appears is that Hayek's view of freedom and equality falls into a model of circular argument.
第三章则试图在上述深化理解的基础上对哈耶克的循环论证倾向作出简要分析。
On the basis of the deeper understanding above, the third chapter tries to give a concise analysis of the trend of Hayek's argument in circles.
循环论证：把有待证实的关键性假设当作已经成立，即前提和结论实质上是一回事。
The fallacy of circular argument: It occurs when the premises presume, openly or covertly, the very conclusion that is to be demonstrated.
在此过程中，马克思首要关注的是人的异化不足，却但出现了私有制和异化的循环论证。
During this process, the primary concern of Marxism is the alienation of problems, but a cycle of private ownership and alienation of the demonstration.
接下来他诉之于上帝完美的存在且不存在欺骗，以此来证明其精神感官的依赖，那看起来像是邪恶的循环论证。
He then appeals to the existence of a perfect God and a non deceiving God to justify reliance on his mental faculties and that just looks viciously circular.
Simon（1947）认定在组织研究中如此频繁地做出某一种安排存在即有效的假设，是一种最恶劣的循环论证。
Simon (1947) concludes that the assumption so often made in organizational studies, that an arrangement is effective because it exists, is a circular argument of the worst sort.
如果仅仅从书本知识出发来研究现实问题，我们难免陷入循环论证的模式中，这种模式无法产生新的知识。
If you just starting to study the knowledge from books practical problems, we will inevitably fall into a tautological model, this model can not generate new knowledge.
有个非常著名的论题是关于认知过程的，称作笛卡尔循环论证，请大家注意，事实上对笛卡尔来说这并不是唯一的问题。
Now there is a very famous problem with this procedure known as the Cartesian circle and I want to draw your attention to the fact that it's not only a problem for Descartes.
笛卡尔循环论证值得关注的地方在于，为什么那么多的学者对其进行讨论,不仅反对笛卡尔论据里的契合点，而更多地是反对普遍观点。
The interest in the Cartesian circle, the reason why it's discussed so much by the scholars is not just anti cohering interest in Descartes arguments it's a much more general point.
把法律权威丧失的原因归结为法律信仰的失落不失深刻，但也存在着用法律权威之丧失解释法律信仰之失落这种循环论证的可能。
It is deep that to sum up the reason why the legal authority loses as legal faith lose, but there have the possibility to explain legal faith with law authoritative losing in a circle.
把法律权威丧失的原因归结为法律信仰的失落不失深刻，但也存在着用法律权威之丧失解释法律信仰之失落这种循环论证的可能。
It is deep that to sum up the reason why the legal authority loses as legal faith lose, but there have the possibility to explain legal faith with law authoritative losing in a circle.
应用推荐