证据开示制度19世纪始于英国，此后，受到各国重视。
Evidence discovery system started in the 19th century in Britain and has drawn much attention in the world ever since.
民事诉讼中的证据开示制度19世纪始于英国，此后受到各国重视。
Evidence discovery system started in the 19th century in Britain and has drawn much attention over the world ever since.
第一部分揭示证据开示制度的内涵，介绍该制度在英美日的现状及发展趋势。
Firstly, I explore the intension of the system, introduce the status quo and its developing direction of the system in the United States, the United Kingdom and Japan.
嫌疑人对证据的知悉则主要体现在英美法系国家的证据开示制度和大陆法系国家律师的阅卷权之中。
Aware of the evidence the suspect was mainly reflected in common law countries, the evidence discovery system and the civil law countries the right to a lawyer among Marking.
通过证据开示制度、释明权、部分请求之取消等民事诉讼审前程序的重构，在我国可以设立强制反诉制度。
The compulsory counterclaim system can be set up in China by such pre-trial proceedings as evidence demonstration system, explanation right and cancel of partial claims.
1938年在美国被确立为一项法定程序制度后，证据开示制度便被纳入许多国家的民事诉讼法或证据法中。
After established as a legal proceeding in 1938 in America, discovery has been adopted in the evidence law by many countries.
第二部分从实际操作角度探讨了我国刑事证据开示制度存在的问题及完善刑事证据开示制度这一专有程序的必要性。
The second part explores on the existing problems of our criminal evidence discovery from a pragmatic view and on the necessity of the completion of such a proprietary criminal procedure.
证据开示制度源自英国，经由英国殖民地者在北美地区对其传统的沿袭，使得证据开示制度在后来成立的美国许多州扎下根来。
Discovery system stemmed from England, then its tradition was followed by the colonists in northern America, which made discovery system rooted in many states of U.
证据开示是现代对抗式诉讼模式的一项重要制度。
There are some factors restricting the foundation of the discovery system of administrative procedure.
证据开示是支撑对抗式审判制度的重要基点。
Evidence open showing is an important centre that is of the antagonism type.
在任何不采用案卷移送制度和实行控辩双方向法庭举证的诉讼结构中，证据开示具有不容忽视的重要意义。
Evidence discovery is of accountable significance in any criminal proceeding structure in which the charge-statement-only doctrine is practiced and the judge's burden of proof is forbidden.
也就是说，在任何不采用案卷移送制度和实行控辩双方向法庭举证的诉讼结构中，证据开示具有不容忽视的重要意义。
In other words, it cannot be overlooked in the lawsuit of not using delivery of dossier and the lawsuit of both libelant and paraclete proof-providing.
也就是说，在任何不采用案卷移送制度和实行控辩双方向法庭举证的诉讼结构中，证据开示具有不容忽视的重要意义。
In other words, it cannot be overlooked in the lawsuit of not using delivery of dossier and the lawsuit of both libelant and paraclete proof-providing.
应用推荐