Courtroom discourse is spoken and interactive.
法庭对话是口头的互动过程。
The interrogative sentence is the base and main feature of the courtroom discourse.
问句是法庭会话的基础和特征。
Repair is a common phenomenon in courtroom discourse, which is such special institutional discourse.
在法庭话语这样一种特殊的机构话语中，修正是普遍而广泛存在的现象。
Within the framework of Labov's narrative theory, this thesis analyzes the cohesive devices of the courtroom discourse;
本文在拉波夫叙事理论的框架中分析语篇的衔接手段；
Based on the tape - recording of 7 trials, the detailed categories and features of courtroom discourse, which is regulated by discourse cooperative degree model, is investigated.
通过对7场真实的法庭庭审话语的考察，探讨在话语合作程度说模式支配下的法庭话语修正的具体类型和特点。
Part Two is a summary of the discourse power in courtroom trial.
第三部分，法庭审判话语权力的语言学分析。
It shows that courtroom participants have their different attitudes and ways of handling facts and there are individualized features in processing discourse information.
研究表明，庭审各方在建构法律事实的过程中表现出不同的态度和处理方法，他们在处理语篇信息时也表现出不同特点。
It shows that courtroom participants have their different attitudes and ways of handling facts and there are individualized features in processing discourse information.
研究表明，庭审各方在建构法律事实的过程中表现出不同的态度和处理方法，他们在处理语篇信息时也表现出不同特点。
应用推荐