This essay mainly analyze the function of grammatical cohesion, such as reference, ellipsis and substitution, conjunction.
本文主要从语法衔接这一角度，分析照应、替代和省略、连接在语篇分析中的作用。
The author adopts the cohesion modal developed by Halliday and Hasan, which is, reference, ellipsis and substitution, conjunction, and lexical cohesion.
作者采用了韩礼德和哈桑总结出的衔接理论，即以照应、省略、替代、连接以及词汇衔接这几种衔接手段为代表的理论框架。
Ellipsis and substitution are not only grammatical relations holding between linguistic forms, but also closely linked to information structure which is based on contexts.
省略和替代不仅是一般意义上的语法关系在语言形式中的体现，而且与以语境为特点的信息结构紧密相关。
Why Chinese prefer repetition, but English people more often use substitution and ellipsis?
汉语民族倾向于使用重复手段，而英语民族常用替代和省略回避重复。
In this part five types of cohesion: reference, substitution, ellipsis, conjunction and lexical cohesion are introduced and applied to the analysis of how the novel is made coherent.
本章介绍了语篇连贯的五种手段：指称、连接、省略、替代和词汇连贯，并运用这些手段对作品的篇章结构进行分析。
The usage of rhetorics in English medical papers was grammatically summarized. Ellipsis, substitution and inver-sion in the rhetorics are introduced in details.
本文总结概括了英文医学科技论文中修辞的使用，并对修辞中省略、替代及倒装的用法作了总结介绍。
The coherence and cohesion of text are realized by many means, for example, deictic, substitution, ellipsis and markers.
语篇的衔接和连贯需要借助许多手段，如指称、替代、省略和标记语。
Chapter one focuses on theory analysis, employs the theory of thought of speech, modes of thinking to explain the different usages of substitution, ellipsis and repetition between English and Chinese.
第一章进行理论分析，用言语思维和思维方式来探究英汉语替代、省略和重复手段运用的差异。
In general, there are more personal reference, substitution and reiteration other than repetition in English and more ellipsis (especially zero anaphora, ZA for short) and repetition in Chinese.
一般说来，英语中存在更多的人称照应、替代以及除原词复现之外的重复，而省略(尤其是零回指)和原词复现则大量出现在汉语中。
The third chapter focuses on the English-Chinese differences of cohesive devices, mainly those of reference, substitution, ellipsis and conjunction.
第三章介绍了汉英两种语言在衔接手段运用上的不同，主要包括语法衔接手段，即照应、省略、替代及连接。
And Huang Guowen classifies reference, substitution and ellipsis into grammatical cohesion, and the other two categories into lexical cohesion. This thesis adopts this classification.
黄国文把照应，替代和省略归为语法衔接，其它两类归为词汇衔接，本文即采用此种分类方法。
Verbal substitution and ellipsis are used to avoid redundant repetition and make the text brief.
动词性替代和省略都是避免重复、突出信息并使上下文紧密连接的语法手段。
Verbal substitution and ellipsis are used to avoid redundant repetition and make the text brief.
动词性替代和省略都是避免重复、突出信息并使上下文紧密连接的语法手段。
应用推荐