While Generative Semantics is no longer regarded as a viable grammatical model, it is important in a number of ways.
尽管生成语义学已不再被视为一个可行的语法模型,但它仍然在许多方面显露出它的重要性。
This paper compares generative grammar and cognitive grammar from four aspects: philosophical basis universal view of language research methodology and the status of semantics.
文章从哲学和心理学基础、语言共性论、语言研究的途径以及语义的地位等四方面将生成语法与认知语法进行了比较。
This paper compares generative grammar and cognitive grammar from four aspects: philosophical basis, universal view of language, research methodology and the status of semantics.
文章从哲学和心理学基础、语言共性论、语言研究的途径以及语义的地位等四方面将生成语法与认知语法进行了比较。
By contrasting simpler syntax with mainstream generative grammar, this paper points out that they are different in minimalism, grammatical architecture and the syntax-semantics interface.
对更简句法和主流生成语法进行了对比分析,指出它们在最简思路、语法建构和句法—语义界面方面存在的差异。
By contrasting simpler syntax with mainstream generative grammar, this paper points out that they are different in minimalism, grammatical architecture and the syntax-semantics interface.
对更简句法和主流生成语法进行了对比分析,指出它们在最简思路、语法建构和句法—语义界面方面存在的差异。
应用推荐