You commit a fallacy of non sequitur when you site in support of a conclusion something that's true but irrelevant.
你会做出不当结论型谬论，当你采用支持结论，为真而不相关的时候。
This premise and the conclusion are completely irrelevant to each other. Aren't they?
这个前提和结论完全，相互无关，不是吗？
Surely that premise is irrelevant to the conclusion.
当然前提与结论无关。
So you site and support of a conclusion, one of your premises is true so that's fine but it's irrelevant to the conclusion.
所以你采用并支持结论，其中一个前提为真，很好，但是与结论不相关。
So you see that isn't a valid argument the reason because is that the premise-it doesn't matter how true the premise is, it's completely irrelevant to the conclusion isn't it?
所以你们看到这不是有效论点，因为前提，没关系，前提有多真，完全与结论无关，不是吗？
Conclusion the mental status facing SARS among the primary pupils is relevant to personality characteristics, and is irrelevant to genders or age.
结论SARS对小学生的心理影响与个性特点有关，与性别、年龄无关。
Conclusion: the RRAGA gene was irrelevant for lung cancer, and the SNP of RRAGA gene was distinct between Chinese and foreigners.
结论：RRAGA基因与肺癌无相关性，中国人RRAGA基因的SNP与外国人的有很大差别。
Conclusion: the RRAGA gene was irrelevant for lung cancer, and the SNP of RRAGA gene was distinct between Chinese and foreigners.
结论：RRAGA基因与肺癌无相关性，中国人RRAGA基因的SNP与外国人的有很大差别。
应用推荐