Surprisingly, use of 100% oxygen may be associated with more harm than benefit when a newborn requires resuscitation.
新生儿需要复苏时用100%的纯氧吸入令人吃惊地发现，弊大于利。
There is insufficient evidence at present on which to recommend a policy of using room air over 100% oxygen, or vice versa, for newborn resuscitation.
婴儿出生时使用空气与氧气复苏的比较 通常推荐100％氧气用作婴儿出生时复苏的气体。
Conclusions: new method of resuscitation for newborn infant should be popularized to prevent asphyxia emergence and reduce the incidence.
结论：为减少脑瘫的发病率，防止窒息产生的严重后果，应推广新生儿新法复苏。
In newborn infants requiring resuscitation, does the use of room air reduce the incidence of death, neurological disability and short term morbidity when compared with the use of 100% oxygen?
对需要复苏的新生儿应用室内空气，与应用100%氧气相比，会降低死亡率、神经残障和短期发病率吗？
In newborn infants requiring resuscitation, does the use of room air reduce the incidence of death, neurological disability and short term morbidity when compared with the use of 100% oxygen?
对需要复苏的新生儿应用室内空气，与应用100%氧气相比，会降低死亡率、神经残障和短期发病率吗？
应用推荐