Methods:62 burn children were divided randomly into 2 groups. 30 cases in MEBT group and 32 cases in SD-Ag group. The efficacy of the two groups was compared.
方法：随机选择62例患儿分两组进行分析比较，即：30例采用烧伤湿性医疗技术治疗者作为治疗组（A组） ，32例采用传统烧伤“干燥疗法”治疗者为对照组（B组） ，观察两组治疗效果。
Methods:62 burn children were divided randomly into 2 groups. 30 cases in MEBT group and 32 cases in SD-Ag group. The efficacy of the two groups was compared.
方法：随机选择62例患儿分两组进行分析比较，即：30例采用烧伤湿性医疗技术治疗者作为治疗组（A组） ，32例采用传统烧伤“干燥疗法”治疗者为对照组（B组） ，观察两组治疗效果。
应用推荐