这种变通办法对于我的例子是适用的，但是也提出了现实中存在的一个有趣的问题。
That workaround suited my example, but it poses an interesting question in real life.
在我做的不可以想要的任何变通办法的行为(重新排序，包装，…)，但解释为什么会这样。
I do not want any workarounds for the behavior (reordering, packing,...) but an explanation why this is happening.
有变通办法，可以实现这一点，但它们具有潜在的危险，因为它们可以越野车或不允许某些情况下/浏览器。
There are workarounds that can achieve this, but they are potentially dangerous because they can be buggy or don't work in certain situations / browsers.
如果有更多的邮件需要归档，或者每天用于归档的时间窗口少于前面假设的20小时，那么下面的变通办法可以帮助将归档并行化。
If there are more mails to be archived, or the time window available for archiving much shorter than the 20 hours assumed above, the following work-around can help parallelize the archiving.
如果有更多的邮件需要归档，或者每天用于归档的时间窗口少于前面假设的20小时，那么下面的变通办法可以帮助将归档并行化。
If there are more mails to be archived, or the time window available for archiving much shorter than the 20 hours assumed above, the following work-around can help parallelize the archiving.
应用推荐