Not on the basis of simple filling in ascending order, but a modified rate of filling as according to the Aufbau Principle.
并不是以简单的升值分布为基础,而是一个修改的填充方法,根据构造原理得到的填充法。
If it doesn't work, change it and just keep revising it, eventually something good comes out of it.
如果行不通就换一个主题,一直修改下去,直到写出好的作品。
So you know from algebra I can't actually solve this. There may be multiple solutions to this. What would I have to do to change my code? And the answer is fortunately not a lot.
我解不出来方程,可能会有多组答案,我需要怎样修改我的代码呢?,很幸运的,答案是不用修改很多。
So, for starters we'll keep that as our zero energy, we're going to change it soon to make something that makes more sense in terms of bonding, but we'll keep that as zero for now.
因此,首先我们将会保持零点能的这个定义,但很快我们就会对它进行修改,使它在讨论成键时更合理,但是目前我们还是暂时采用这种定义。
You don't have to try to get the change of law You don't have to get the supreme court to change its mind. All you have to do is to get out your credit card and go online and it's done.
不必试图修改法律,也不必游说最高法院,做出什么改变,你需要做的,只是掏出你的信用卡,登陆网站,然后一切搞定。
So I hit control X. It's very unnecessarily arcanely saying save modified buffer, and then answering no will destroy changes.
敲入控制键X,它会很罗嗦地,问你是否保存所做的修改,如果回答为NO,就不保存修改过的部分。
So we revise the personality theory to say, the secret to personal identity is having the same personality-- provided that there's no branching.
所以我们对人格理论稍作修改,提出人格理论的秘诀在于-,给人格提供无分支的前提。
So he but he moves to question ? should law be changed? Is law changeable?
是的,但他还是质问,法律应被修改吗?法律是可改变的吗?
Let's just take our reversible engine and modify it a little bit.
我们就拿可逆热机为研究对象,并对它进行一点修改。
Wright revised this image in those drafts.
进行了修改。
So I think about these categories have to be considerably revised.
所以我觉得那种划分方法,必须进行大幅修改。
Now, I'm going to add one more amendment.
现在我再稍微修改一下
We'd be typically refining the schedule.
我们会修改日程。
You might conclude that these features are evidence of multiple authorship a good deal of revision which points itself to a kind of composite structure different layers maybe, different sources.
所以这些特点会让你认为有很多作者,很多次的修改,会让结构看起来世合并而成的,不同的层次,不同的素材。
They destroy these helpless but stoic humans who are chafing under their tyrannical and unjust and uncaring rule. In the biblical story, when the Israelites told the story, they modified it.
他们把那些在他们残暴,不公平统治下,无助又愤愤不平的人,全部消灭了,当犹太人来讲这个故事时,他们对此做了修改。
That revisions may have been made, so that you might have different sources that have been revised or put together in different ways. Right?
这些修订,以便于你可以对,不同的素材,以不同方式,进行修改或者重组?
All right. What do you do when you've found the bug and you need to fix it?
好了,当你发现错误并修改它们的时候,你该怎么做?记住一个古老的法则?
That generally is just modifying a few bytes, a few kilobytes worth of information.
这个操作通常只是修改了几个,或者几千字节的有价值的信息。
So I could get to that object either through this path or through that path, it didn't matter which path I use to modify it, I would see it when I looked at the other. Yes.
另外一条绑定获得这个对象,无论我通过哪个绑定来修改它,我都能在两个绑定中都看到做的改变,是这样的。
Ask yourself, will it fix all of the symptoms you've seen?
你第一个想到的修改方案,它能否解决你看到的所有症状?如果不行?
So that's the marginal improvement here and we've seen this syntax before.
所以这有少量的修改,我们之前遇到过这个语法。
Well,maybe what we should have to do is revise the claim yet again.
也许我们要做的事再度修改这个说法。
Texts were modified in the course of their transmission.
因此,在传播的过程中,经文被修改了。
So let's fix it.
所以让我们来修改一下。
Antiquity or tradition alone is no justification yet at the same time he seems to recognize that changes in law even when the result : is improvement are dangerous. He writes "It is a bad thing to habituate people to reckless dissolution of laws.
作为借口,但同时,他似乎也体认到法律修改,就算结果是改善,仍是很危险的作法,他写到,“让人民习惯于鲁莽的法律,崩溃是不好的事。
Now finally swap has the ability, the power, to modify memory that isn't his own, that's not in his own scope because we've passed it in by address.
最终swap有能力,来修改不属于它的内存,不在它的作用域中,因为我们是通过地址传递的。
Because the program is constantly revising its strategies, in light of what's worked and what hasn't worked in the past.
因为程序会不断依据过去,有效无效经验修改其策略
应用推荐