The idea of risk, that economic risks can be pooled, is an intuitive one that has occurred to people throughout history.
风险理论,即认为经济风险可以分摊,是历史过程中,人们逐渐发现的理论。
That's what, in principle, we can do and what I think is the most important concept in finance--this concept of risk pooling.
原则上,这就是我们能做的,我认为这也是金融业最重要的概念,即风险汇聚及分摊。
If we could do sort, then we saw, if we amortized the cost, that searching is a lot more efficient if we're searching a sorted list.
如果我们可以做排序,然后我们可以看到,如果我们分摊开支,在有序列表中搜索将会变得更高效。
If there's a tie then the voters split.
出现平局时选票会分摊
The problem is that while the principle of risk-sharing is very simple and obvious the practice requires technology.
问题在于,尽管风险分摊原则,听起来浅显易懂,但是实践仍然需要技术支持。
But, because of the logic of risk management we have to make a deal with them; so, it becomes more formal and impersonal.
但是,基于风险管理的逻辑,我们必须和他们达成协议;,使分摊正规化而不受主观情绪的影响。
It's a continuation of the second lecture, where I talked about the principle of dispersal of risk.
作为第二节课内容的延续,当时我讲过关于风险分摊的原则。
So, the idea that theorists suggest-- and it may be unreachable-- but the perfect financial system would have all of our risks pooled completely.
理论家提出的这一理论-,可能无法达到-,但是一个完美的金融体系,能够将所有的风险完全分摊。
On the other hand, am I likely to only search a list once? Probably not. There are going to be multiple elements I'm going to be looking for, so that suggests that in fact, I want to amortize the cost.
我可能就搜索一次么?,可能不是,可能我要找好多个元素,这样的情况下,我们就能分摊开销了,这告诉我们什么?这意味着。
It really is probability theory and the idea of spreading risk through risk pooling.
就是概率论,以及通过风险汇聚来分摊风险
There's also a problem with risk-sharing at that level.
还有另一个风险分摊程度的问题。
Diversification and pooling are really the same thing but we had a separate set of institutions.
分摊和汇聚实质上是一回事,只是我们有不同的机构
We want to share things, but we want to get more scientific about how we share things and that means-- and we want to be effective.
我们才想要分摊风险,但我们得用更科学的方式,也可说是更有效率的方式-,来分摊风险。
The best you can do sharing among yourselves is sharing your own risk, the risk of your own community; but your own community goes up and down and you're not sharing widely enough.
你们所能做的仅仅是在成员之间,分摊自己的风险,即你们这个小团体的风险;,但由于共有背景下的正相关性,你们的风险无法摊薄。
The voters of that position split evenly.
即该立场的选票会被平均分摊
Anytime there's a risk that hits one person or one country the financial markets would spread it out over everybody and it gets very small.
如果有风险袭击一个人或者一个国家,金融市场就会将风险分摊到所有人身上,风险就变得微乎其微。
In the second lecture, I talked about the pooling of risks and the basic theme of that lecture was that we now have a mathematical theory, probability theory.
第二课,我讲了风险汇聚及分摊,那节课的主题是,一门数学理论,即概率论。
Well, they would probably agree that we'd do some risk-sharing, right?
也许会达成共识,我们来分摊风险,对吧?
The problem is that if you want to do risk-sharing, you're not, ideally, sharing with someone who's just like you living in Israel, working in a certain agricultural industry-- because there are lots of risks that you've already shared.
如果你真的想要达到风险分摊的效果,理论上说,就不应该只和与你的同伴,比如同住在以色列,一样从事农业的人来分摊-,因为你们承担的许多风险是正相关的。
You should be sharing your risks with someone who's completely different-- probably living on the other side of the world in a completely different industry, where the weather, the institutions, and the political situation are completely different.
你应该跟,与你截然不同的人-,也许是住在世界另一端的人,从事毫不相关的行业的人,生活在完全不同的气候,制度,以及政治环境里的人来分摊。
So, that means we have to devise ways of sharing with people that we've never met, that we don't care about--I mean, maybe we care about everybody, but we don't have any particular emotional ties to them-- and they're very different people.
那意味着我们必须设计一些方法,使我们与素未谋面的,并不亲近的人们一同分摊风险,也许我们非常博爱,但未必对所有人都会怀有特殊情感-,分摊者应该是与我们非常不同的人。
It doesn't work so easily to share with those people along the lines that these communities--I think these communes tend to emphasize a social compact, a feeling for each other, a caring for each other, which is a lovely thought but it doesn't achieve risk management on a big scale.
但要实现跟满足这些条件的人分摊风险,绝非易事,这些共同体。。。我指这些公社,倾向于强调一种社会凝聚力,一种人与人的深情和关怀,这个想法听上去很美,但无法实现大规模有成效的风险管理。
Now I'm in better shape, right? Especially for really large n or for a lot of k, because now in general, this is going to be smaller than that.
很大的k也大的情况,因为这样这就比这个小了,这种情况是分摊。
Once I have it sorted I can search it in log n time, but that's still isn't as good as just doing n. And this led to this idea of amortization, which is I need to not only factor in the cost, but how am I going to use it?
一旦对其完成排序,就可以在log,n的时间内对其完成搜索,但是这样做仍然不如n的复杂度,这样做引出了耗时分摊的想法,这时不仅需要考虑耗时的因素?
应用推荐