You were a, first a participant, and then an instructor in outward bound, which is not like we staff.
你最开始是拓展训练的参与者,后来又成为了教练,这很不同于我们的工作。
but I find that, you know, just kind of market participants are more to blame than the accounting per se in those examples.
但是我发现,在这些例子当中市场参与者比会计本身更应该受到责备。
The Taylor rule specifies specific variables and everybody at the markets would understand the rule, ? and that's correct, right?
像泰勒规则就明确了具体的变量,市场中每一个参与者也都能够理解,这个没错吧?
She was part of the clinical trial that did this, and they gave everybody certificates after it was done.
她当时就在参与疫苗的临床试验,试验后他们会给每个参与者颁发一个证明
Well, there's another way to look at returns -those are the dollar-weighted returns -and the dollar-weighted returns actually do a better job of describing the experience of the group of investors that participated in these funds.
还有另一种考察回报率的参数,货币加权回报,货币加权回报实际上,是描述基金参与者收益的,一个更好的指标
Now why? When I put this class together, I didn't think to myself, "Ok, so what are the things that I need to introduce ?" in order to please the participants in the class, the students?"
为什么?,当我开这门课程时,我自己没想过,“好的,我需要介绍些什么东西,以便能取悦课程的参与者,这些学生呢“
Let's talk a little bit about the participants in this dialogue.
我们再来谈谈,这场对话的参与者。
And if Player I chooses bottom, then center yields 2, right yields 0: 2 is bigger than 0 again.
如果参与者I选择下,选中的收益是2,选右的收益是0,2大于0
McKinsey and Hamilton have both been participants Of this projects. And what we've been trying to do is Isolate a few key areas that make sense for MIT doing Explore extensively. Now some of the challenges first Are that the technologies advance quickly.
包括McKinsey和Hamilton都是参与者,我们试图区分出一些关键领域,而不是让麻省理工做广泛的探索,现在的一些挑战在于,科学技术瞬息万变。
Now, there's a lot of words here, I mean there's a lot of words, there's a lot of abbreviations, there's a lot of players.
这里涉及到很多名词,我是指有很多名词 很多的缩写,它们都是免疫活动的参与者
Governments establish regulators who set down rules for participants in financial markets and these rules may be perceived as onerous and costly to people in the financial community, but ultimately it's their salvation and it's what makes everything possible.
政府设立监管机构,监管机构为金融市场的参与者,制定法规条令,这些规则对金融界,有着极其严格的约束,但这些规则最终使得金融界运作良好,免遭灭顶之灾
0% of participants eyesight improved significantly, as a result of just changing the situation.
0%的参与者的视力有明显改善,仅仅是在改变情境的情况下。
He is the author, but not the participant.
他是作者,但非参与者。
Ale, do you want to ask this guy in the blue shirt here, does Player I have a dominated strategy?
艾尔,那个穿蓝衬衫的男孩,参与者I有劣势策略吗
If Player I chose top, center yields 3, right yields 0: 3 is bigger than 0.
如果参与者I选择上,选中的收益是3,选右的收益为0,3大于0
So what we know here, we know that Player II should not choose right.
从中我们得出参与者II不应该选右
What Patrick said was: no, Player I does not have a dominated strategy.
帕特里克刚所说的是,参与者I没有劣势策略
For instance, if Player II picks left then Player I wants to pick bottom, but if Player II picks center, Player I wants to pick center.
例如,参与者II选择左,参与者I会选择下,但是若参与者II选择中,参与者I会选择中
What about, raise hands this time, what about Player II?
这次举手回答,参与者II呢
No, Player I doesn't have a dominated strategy.
不,参与者I没有劣势策略
Does Player II have a dominated strategy?
参与者II有劣势策略吗
I'll say it again, Player i's strategy "s'i" is weakly dominated by her strategy "si" if she always does at least as well by choosing "si" than choosing "s'i" regardless of what everyone else does, and sometimes she does strictly better.
重申一下,参与者i的策略s'i,弱劣于策略si,当且仅当无论对手怎么做,她选择si的收益至少与选s'i的相等,有些情况下甚至是严格占优的
应用推荐