In fact,if you wanted to argue against, say,the Letter of Hebrews being included,you could say, "But all the people in the East don't accept the Letter of Hebrews as part of their canon,so we shouldn't,either."
实际上,如果你想反对,希伯来书被选上,你可以说,“但是东方的人都不承认希伯来书,属于他们的正典,所以我们也不应承认“
OK, so far though, I've just shown you what happens inside a peace a code. It raises an exception. It goes to that accept clause. We don't have to use it just inside of one place.
好了,我已经给你们看了,代码内部发生了什么,它报了一个异常,然后就到了处理的片段,我们不该就在一个地方用它。
And it certainly looks as though if you don't believe in souls, you have to accept the body theory of personal identity.
而且很明显,如果你不信灵魂论,你就只能接受,人格同一性的肉体论了。
Well, first of all, you may not survive for long, if you truly don't accept the fact that things, people being no exception fall when left in mid-air.
首先,你可能活不长,如果你不接受,人会从半空中掉下来的事实。
So I don't necessarily accept all my irrational thoughts and again, we'll talk about it much more next week of how we can cognitively reframe what we were thinking.
我没有必要接受,所有不理智的想法,下周我们会更深入地探讨,如何认知性地重塑自己的想法。
Well, one way of course is to accept the objection and say " "You're right Death isn't really bad for me " And some philosophers have indeed accepted that very conclusion, maybe Epicurus Most of us want to say " "No, no Death is bad for me" So we need a better answer to the ?" "Oh yeah? When is it bad for you?"
一种方式当然是接受它并说,“你是对的,死亡对我来说真的没什么坏处“,而一些哲学家确实接受了,那个结论,也许比如伊壁鸠鲁,我们大多数人想说,“不,不,死亡对我来说有坏处“,于是我们需要一个更好的答案来回答,“是么?,它什么时候对你有坏处了“
应用推荐