-
One tip about this, try to identify all the dominated strategies of all players before you delete, then delete.
这里有一个窍门,在剔除之前试着找出,所有参与人的劣势策略,然后再剔除它们
-
and delete her voicemail messages so as that they could record more and listen to them all.
删除她的语音留言，这样他们就能记录更多，而且听到所有的语音。
-
But it is the case that they're dominated once we delete the dominated strategies: once we delete 67 and above.
但一旦我们剔除了原劣势策略,即选择67及大于67的数之后,他们才是劣势策略
-
So this we would want to delete in order for the code not to run the risk of crashing, but let's now see this was made by an excellent teacher out at Stanford University.
我要按顺序删除它，不要冒崩溃的风险,但是这个是由一个来自斯坦福大学的,优秀教师做的。
-
We can look at it here; we looked at append, which added things to lists, we looked at delete, deleting things from a list.
看看这儿，append方法给数组，增加了一些内容，我们还学习了，如何删除数组中的元素。
-
We can delete those strategies and once we delete those strategies, all that's left are choices 1 through 67.
我们可以剔除那些策略,一旦如此,剩下只有1到67的数
-
Once you delete the dominated strategies, then you kind of go through it again and then 2 is dominated by 3.
一旦你剔除了劣势策略,再次审视这个博弈时,立场2劣势于立场3
-
So if you archive it, that's maybe a little hint that either this is just your habit or perhaps that you might actually care about this later in the future, whereas if you delete it, no, you really don't care. Yeah.
如果你把邮件存档，可能暗示这可能,是你的习惯,或者以后还会用到它，相反，如果你删除了它，说明你可能根本不在意这个邮件。
-
And this is because as you start writing--saving files to your hard drive, what happens is you might save this file here, then this one, then this one, then this one, but very reasonably you might go back eventually and delete this one.
这是因为当你开始对硬盘驱动器进行读写时,你可以保存一个文件到磁盘的某处，然后再一个，再一个，又一个，最后你可能回到这,并删除这一个文件。
-
Delete those. Delete those for everyone else, because everyone else is not going to play a dominated strategy.
应该剔除它们,其他人也会这么做,因为其他人也不会,采用劣势策略
-
If we delete the strategies 1 and 10, which were dominated, then does 3 dominate 2?
如果我们剔除劣势策略1和10,那么策略3优于策略2吗
-
But they are dominated they're weakly dominated once we delete 68 through 100.
可是一旦我们排除掉了68至100的数,他们就成为了劣势的策略,即弱劣势策略
-
So let's be careful here, we're not saying that we're going to delete the voters at 1, or delete the voters at 10, though we might wish to.
我们需要注意的是,我们并没有说要剔除立场1,或者立场10的选票,虽然我们希望能这样
-
Well, we would just delete the... We would iteratively delete dominated strategies.
我觉得我们可以,迭代剔除劣势策略
-
Delete those. Look at the game with all those dominated strategies deleted.
先剔除劣势策略,然后重新观察这个博弈
-
But what about right now before we delete anything?
但是如果我们不剔除任何策略呢
-
Delete those.
剔除他它们
-
These strategies aren't dominated, nor are they dominated once you delete the dominated strategies, nor once we dominated the strategies dominated once we've deleted the dominated strategies, but they are dominated once we delete the strategies that have been dominated in the-- you get what I'm doing here.
选择20到30的策略一开始不处于劣势,在第一次剔除劣势策略时也不处于劣势,在第二次剔除势策略之后,也不处于劣势,但是在第三次剔除劣势策略之后,就变成劣势策略了,我想你们明白我的意思了
-
So Christine is correct in saying that once we delete the strategies 1 and 10 once we realize that those positions are not going to be chosen by our sophisticated candidates then we realize that probably choosing 2 isn't a good idea either.
克里斯汀说的很对,一旦我们剔除了策略1和10,一旦我们意识到,不会有人选择这些立场时,我们会发现,选立场2或9可能也不是个好主意了
-
So what Christine is arguing is, even though it's the case that 2 is not a dominated strategy, if we do the process of iterative deletion of dominated strategies and we delete the dominated strategies, then maybe we should look again and see if it's dominated now.
克里斯汀说的是,即使选择立场2不是劣势策略,如果我们迭代剔除劣势策略,然后我们剔除掉了劣势策略,然后再来回头看看还有没有劣势策略了
-
And if I did this, and again, don't scribble too much in your notes but if we just make it clear what's going on here, I'm actually going to delete these strategies since they're never going to be played I end up with a little box again.
如果我再进行一次,别在笔记上乱画,我们只是想知道最后会怎样,因为这些策略不会被人采用,所以我剔除掉它们,最后我得到了一个更小的方格
-
Okay, so if we had stopped the class after the first week where all we learned to do was to delete dominated strategies, we'd be stuck, we'd have nothing to say about this game and as I said before, this is the most important game, so that would be bad news for Game Theory.
好了,如果我们只学了第一周的内容,即如果我们只学到了剔除劣势策略的话,我们没招了,我们无法解释这个博弈,但我之前说了,这是个很重要的博弈,这对博弈论来说可不是个好消息
-
Okay, good. So in Gmail context most of you know, you cannot--you can delete things but most people just save or archive emails.
好，在Gmail中，大多数人都知道，你能删除邮件,但是大多数人会选择保存或者存档邮件。
-
Delete those lines of code and move them up to the top and problem solved.
把这几行代码删除，然后把它们放到,前面去，问题就解决了。
-
Try to identify all the dominated strategies of all players again, and then delete.
再次寻找所有,参与人的劣势策略,再剔除它们
-
So we know that 2 is not dominated, and particularly not dominated by 3, When you delete the dominated strategy of 2 dominating 1, or 1 being dominated, when you delete that and 10, then it is.
我们知道选立场2并不是劣势策略,它并不劣于选立场3,当你剔除劣于策略2的劣势策略1,或者说立场1处于劣势,当你剔除策略1和10之后,2就变成劣势策略了
-
These strategies I'm about to delete, it isn't that they're never best responses, they were best responses to things, but the things they were best responses to, are things that are never going to be played, so they're irrelevant.
我现在剔除掉的策略,他们并非不是最佳对策,他们是某些情况下的最佳对策,但是使他们成为最佳对策的条件,是不会发生的,所以它们就不成立
-
And then you can delete it once you're sure your code is working right.
当你们能够确定你们的代码运行正常的话，你们可以把这个“printf“,语句删除掉。
-
I'm going to delete that arrow and actually draw s2 as pointing to this chunk of memory because whereas before this sequence of chars might have lived at address 71 or whatever, well, this one might live at 91.
我不会把那个箭头删除，实际上我画了s2作为,这块内存的指针，因为,这个字符序列存储在地址71或其它的地方，这个可能存储在91的地方。
应用推荐