These are stupid questions, because once you understand what they're asking, the answer is just built in. It follows trivially.
这是些很愚蠢的问题,因为一旦你明白了他们的问题,答案就在其中,一切简单明了
So all of Book I is really a kind of warm up for what follows in the rest of the book.
所以整个第一册其实是,类似一种为往后各册所做的暖身。
The chapter begins with a temporal clause which is unfortunately often translated "In the beginning," which implies that what follows is going to give you an ultimate account of the origins of the universe.
它以时间状语开篇,但不幸的是,它常被翻译为“开始的时候“,这暗示着接下来它将会为你展示,大量关于宇宙起源的描述。
Notice the freedom that he exercises in unfolding what feels like an improvisatory monologue in which he makes you race to keep up with him as he follows a semi-hidden logic that he treats as self-evident.
注意他随意地展开,一段即席的独白,让所有人都跟随他的脚步,而他跟随着自己若隐若现的但自认为显而易见的逻辑。
When these tyrannies take place, they last for different periods of time, but when the tyrant is removed, what follows after that is, there is never again in that town a one-man rule of any kind.
当僭主统治步入历史舞台,它走过了很多历史时期,但当它寿终正寝之后,在那座城邦里再也没有出现过,任何形式的独裁者了
For those of you who still do believe in the existence of souls I suppose you could take a great deal in discussions that follows as some form of large conditional or subjunctive if there were no souls then here's what we have to say.
如果你们有人,还是相信灵魂的存在,或者你可以从以下的讨论里,也学到一些东西,把讨论看成有条件性和假定性的,假设没有灵魂,然后就是我们要讨论的东西。
So what follows, in one sense, that when Aristotle says that man is by nature a political animal and the city is by nature, the city can never be a universal state.
这响应了,亚里士多德所说,人类天生是政治动物,而城市是自然的演变,城市永远不能是一座万国之城。
应用推荐