So one case to think about is what if the other firm, you're Coke, what if Pepsi is pricing below cost?

一种情况是如果另一家公司,假如说你是可口可乐,如果百事可乐定价低于成本怎么办

耶鲁公开课 - 博弈论课程节选

Zero profits, I'll make zero profits, so that certainly is a best response, pricing at marginal cost as well.

零利润,我将没有利润,所以这确实是一个最佳对策,也定价在边际成本

耶鲁公开课 - 博弈论课程节选

Suppose Firm 1 is pricing at marginal cost and Firm 2 is pricing at something higher, a little bit higher.

假设公司1定价在边际成本,公司2定价稍微高点,高一点点

耶鲁公开课 - 博弈论课程节选

Firm 1 is pricing at marginal cost, the best response if the other guy is pricing at marginal cost is to price at marginal cost or above.

公司1定价在边际成本,针对对手定价在边际成本的最佳对策,是定价高于或等于边际成本

耶鲁公开课 - 博弈论课程节选

Suppose Firm 1 is pricing at marginal cost is this a Nash Equilibrium?

假设公司1定价在边际成本,这是纳什均衡吗

耶鲁公开课 - 博弈论课程节选

Pepsi's pricing exactly at marginal cost, what's my best response?

百事将价格精确地设定在边际成本,我的最佳对策是什么

耶鲁公开课 - 博弈论课程节选

Pepsi's pricing below cost, what's your best response?

百事可乐定价低于成本,你的最佳对策是什么

耶鲁公开课 - 博弈论课程节选

If Firm II is charging C, Then a best response for Firm 1 is to set price equal to marginal costs, and if Firm 1 is pricing at marginal cost, then conversely a best response for Firm 2 is to price at marginal cost.

如果公司2选择了C,公司1的最佳对策是,定价在边际成本,如果公司1定价在边际成本,同样的,公司2的最佳对策,也是定价在边际成本

耶鲁公开课 - 博弈论课程节选