It's a very appealing kind of a priori theory, but the thing about theories is they're supposed to make predictions.

这是一个很有吸引力的早期理论，但是理论的意义在于,它们可以被用来进行预测。

耶鲁公开课 - 金融市场课程节选

A priori, Google has probably not going to know what you care about.

作为先驱，谷歌也许并不知道,你关注什么。

哈佛公开课 - 计算机科学课程节选

So a priori, this was not necessarily true.

所以先验的并不一定是正确的。

麻省理工公开课 - 热力学与动力学课程节选

And so similarly as Gmail's priority inbox, it's gonna be pretty flawed for a lot of us at least initially because it just doesn't know the answers a priori correctly unless we teach it or program it to be better. There is also another flaw in here or multiple flaws arguably.

类似于Gmail的优先收件箱，在起初使用时对大多数人来说它是有缺陷的,因为它不知道如何正确判断优先级,除非我们事先告诉它或编写程序改良它,另外这里存在一个或多个漏洞，可以说是缺陷。

哈佛公开课 - 计算机科学课程节选