Some groups mobilized their members to use the question and answer session creatively to raise their own issues, as President Obama explained.

VOA: standard.2009.03.26

So strong and far reaching are these rights that they raise the question of what, if anything, the state may do.

这些权利如此强大，如此深远,以至引发一个问题，如果有的话，政府可以做什么。

耶鲁公开课 - 公正课程节选

But now that we're here,we're in a position perhaps to raise the question, should we be asking what it takes to survive?

现在我们必须想要提出的问题应该是，要怎样才能生存？

耶鲁公开课 - 死亡课程节选

Even to raise such a question seems to pose insuperable obstacles.

光是提出这样的问题,就像是丢出了许多不能克服的障碍。

耶鲁公开课 - 政治哲学导论课程节选

There it wouldn't be possible to invoke an intention because the whole complication of Derrida is precisely to raise the question about not knowing, not being able to voice the differance between difference and differance and not knowing whether Archie is right or whether Edith is right.

这里它不可能引起一个意图,以为德里达的复杂之处恰恰在于,提出一类问题，有关不知道的，说不出来的,像是区别和延异之间的差别,也不知道阿齐和依迪斯谁对谁错。

耶鲁公开课 - 文学理论导论课程节选

Final question, just to raise: I've talked in terms of the modular view but there might also be profound general differences between children and adults, not just specific to how you think about objects or how you think about people or how you think about this or how you think about that, but rather more general.

再说最后一个问题,我刚才是从模块理论的角度来讲述的,但在儿童与成人之间,或许还存在着深刻的一般性差异,不仅仅是具体到如何看待客体,如何看待他人,或是如何看待这个,如何看待那个,相反会更加一般化

耶鲁公开课 - 心理学导论课程节选

I may want to finish the particular point that I'm making, I'll try to come back to you and I'll then raise your question.

也许我想结束这个我制造的特定点，我会试着回到这里并提出你的问题。

耶鲁公开课 - 死亡课程节选

No longer able to raise the question, "Is this all there is?"

无法提出“难道生命仅此而已“的问题“

耶鲁公开课 - 死亡课程节选

Here is Hobbes' rewriting of the Golden Rule in terms of these laws of nature but these raise a question for us ? as readers of Hobbes. Right? Don't they?

这里霍布斯从自然法的角度,重写的黄金法则,但是这给我们这些霍布斯的的读者们,带来了一个问题，对吧！不是吗？

耶鲁公开课 - 政治哲学导论课程节选

At the end of last class,I began to raise the question as to whether or not we should distinguish two questions that we would normally be inclined to run together.

在上节课的最后我提出以下问题,是否该要区别这两个,我们通常倾向于一视同仁的问题。

耶鲁公开课 - 死亡课程节选

I don't mean to suggest in any way that we yet know the answer to that question, but at least that's a question that it seems as though we can coherently raise.

我不是想说我们,一定可以找到这个答案,但至少这是个我们,可以合理提出地问题

耶鲁公开课 - 死亡课程节选

A question we can legitimately raise.

一个可以合理提出的问题

耶鲁公开课 - 死亡课程节选

Instead,I want to raise the following question.

换而提出以下问题。

耶鲁公开课 - 死亡课程节选