The concept he calls a "signified" and the sound image he calls a "signifier."
事物被称为所指,声音形象被称为能指“
So that what's new in Saussure's thinking about the relationship between signified and signifier is that the sign tied up in this relationship is both arbitrary and differential.
这就是索绪尔所贡献的了,能指和所指的关系,也就是符号的组成方式,是任意的,有差别的。
He says: he signification "sign" has always been comprehended and determined, in its sense, as sign-of, signifier referring to a signified, signifier different from its signified.
他说,“符号“的意义“,总是被理解和决定的,在符号这个意义上,能指指向所指,能指与它的所指不同。
the signified-signifier relationship, as I said, is arbitrary.
所指和能指的关系,就如我刚才说的,是任意的。
Deconstruction calls into question the distinction between language and thought in calling into question the distinction between signifier and signified, even though, as Derrida says, it can't do without a Saussurian vocabulary.
解构主义怀疑,语言和思想的区别,其方式是,怀疑能指和所指之间的区别,尽管如此,正如德里达所说没有索绪尔词汇也是不行的。
These are some of the implications of no longer being satisfied with the way in which a sign can be understood as a concept to which we attach belatedly a signification, a signifier.
有一些意指已不满足于,符号被理解为概念的方式了,我们就再赋予它们一个含义,一个能指。
应用推荐