• This answer that says I just undercut Pepsi, that's true provided that Pepsi hasn't gone above the monopoly price.

    比百事定价低点的答案,只有在百事没有高于,垄断价格时才是正确的

    耶鲁公开课 - 博弈论课程节选

  • they undercut labor practices,

    人们缩减劳动执行要求

    爱护小朋友 - SpeakingMax英语口语达人

  • Why? Because no matter how the other firm, your competitor, prices you might have an incentive to undercut them.

    为什么,因为不管你对手怎么定价,你总有想削弱他们的动机

    耶鲁公开课 - 博弈论课程节选

  • The last thing you want is to have the other firm undercut you, in an attempt to push prices down.

    你最不想看到别的企业,通过降价来打压你

    耶鲁公开课 - 博弈论课程节选

  • If they're not at the competitive output they could undercut price and take the entire market.

    如果他们不按照完全竞争产量生产,就可以通过降低价格来抢占市场

    耶鲁公开课 - 博弈论课程节选

  • In the second case, if both firms undercut each other, you end up with low prices, that's actually good for consumers but bad for firms.

    在第二个案例中,如果两家企业互相削弱,最终会压低价格,这对消费者有利,但对企业不利

    耶鲁公开课 - 博弈论课程节选

  • Both firms have an incentive to undercut the other firm, driving down profits for both.

    每个企业都有削弱对手的动机,最后他们的利润都下降了

    耶鲁公开课 - 博弈论课程节选

  • So if Pepsi is dumb enough to price above monopoly, sure I will undercut Pepsi but I won't undercut Pepsi by a penny, I'll undercut Pepsi all the way down to the monopoly price and make monopoly profits.

    如果百事笨到把价格设的高于垄断价格,我当然要定价比百事低,但不是低一点,我要把价格设得比百事低直至垄断价格,并获取垄断收益

    耶鲁公开课 - 博弈论课程节选

  • So basically what I'm going to do here is I'm going to set my price to equal his price, minus a little bit, I'll just undercut him a little bit and by just undercutting him a little bit, I'm going to get the whole of the market and I'll make as much money as I can on those sales.

    所以基本上我要做的是,设定我的价格等于他的价格,减去一点点,我的价格将仅仅比他的低一点点,并且通过比他的价格低一点点,我将占领整个市场,那些销售带给我尽可能多的钱

    耶鲁公开课 - 博弈论课程节选

$firstVoiceSent
- 来自原声例句
小调查
请问您想要如何调整此模块?

感谢您的反馈,我们会尽快进行适当修改!
进来说说原因吧 确定
小调查
请问您想要如何调整此模块?

感谢您的反馈,我们会尽快进行适当修改!
进来说说原因吧 确定