Archie, of course, can't stand this because for him it's perfectly clear that a rhetorical question is a rhetorical question.
阿齐当然无法忍受,因为对他来说,很明显修辞问句就是修辞问句。
Also, it can be a rhetorical question or a question that does not want to be answered.
当然,这也可以用在问一种修辞的问题,或一种不需要回答的问题。
And ironically you sense, when you read this that even though Cain intends this as a rhetorical question "Am I my brother's keeper?"--in fact, he's right on the money.
当读到这一段的时候,你能感觉到其中的讽刺意味,尽管该隐的回答是一个设问句,“难道我是他的看守吗?“,事实上,指钱的话,他说的是对的。
In other words, Archie has asked a rhetorical question.
换句话说依迪斯用了个修辞的问句。
It can be a rhetorical question or a real question.
它可以是修辞意义上的问句,也可以是一个真实的问题。
De Man's point is a question is both rhetorical and grammatical, and the one cannot be reduced to the other. Both readings are available.
德曼想指出的是,一个问句既是修辞型问句又是语法型问句,那么一个不能变成另一个,两种理解都有效。
Edith, a reader of sublime simplicity, as de Man says, misinterprets the rhetorical question as a grammatical question: "What is the difference? I'm curious to know."
而依迪斯一个极端天真的读者,正如德曼所说,错误地将这个修辞问句理解成一个语法型问句:,“区别在哪里呢,我想知道“
He makes a perfectly plausible argument to the effect that the question is grammatical rather than rhetorical.
他提出了一个貌似非常可信的论据,大意是说这个问句是语法型的,而不是修辞型的。
应用推荐