The law of talion, which is essentially the principle that a person should be punished according to the injury they inflicted, it's been decried as a primitive, archaic reflex of the vengeance or vendetta principle.
复仇法,本质上讲述了人应该根据其所造成的伤害,接受处罚的原则,却遭到了谴责,人们认为它是,复仇或仇杀原则原始古老的反映。
And so it's a mistake, according to strong theories of rights, it's a mistake to think about justice or law by just adding up preferences and values.
这些强有力的权利理论认为,下列看法是错误的,不该只以偏好和价值的加总,来考虑公正或法律。
So, let's think qualitatively for a second about what that means or what the real meaning of that is. What that is telling us is that according to Newtonian mechanics and Coulomb's force law, is that the electron should actually plummet into the nucleus in 0.1 nanoseconds.
让我们定性的想想,这意味着什么,这告诉我们,根据牛顿力学,和库仑定律,电子,在0。1纳秒内,就会掉到原子核里面。
But what I'm trying to get at is do you consider that you are under no obligation, since you haven't actually entered into any act of consent, but for prudential reasons, you do what you're supposed to do according to the law?
但我想知道的是,你认为自己,不负有任何义务,因为你并未真正作出任何形式的同意,只是出于谨慎考虑,你还是会依法缴税,是吗?
应用推荐