We understand irony only, he means, to the extent to which we are in agreement with the other person.

他的意思是,我们只能在赞同对方观点的程度上,理解讽刺。

耶鲁公开课 - 文学理论导论课程节选

We had 80% agreement with that in Los Angeles; so people were really worried.

0%的洛杉矶居民都会担心,看得出人们担忧情绪很重

耶鲁公开课 - 金融市场课程节选

So basically, we're stuck with this verbal agreement and we both have an incentive to cheat and produce more whatever it is, sugar water.

但不管怎样,在这个口头协议不起作用,我们都有违约,生产更多这种糖水的动机

耶鲁公开课 - 博弈论课程节选

Toward the bottom of the footnote, 731, left-hand column, ust as in conversation, we understand irony to the extent to which we are in agreement on the subject with the other person."

在731页左边一栏脚注的最下边，他说道，“正如在谈话中我们能理解讽刺，he，says，，“…,在我们赞同对方观点的程度上“

耶鲁公开课 - 文学理论导论课程节选

So what's wrong with that agreement? What are they?

这种协议有什么问题呢

耶鲁公开课 - 博弈论课程节选

They're two water companies, so they're Poland Spring and Coca-Cola I guess these days, sign this agreement saying that each one's going to produce half monopoly quantity and what's going to go wrong with that agreement?

有两家瓶装水公司,比如说波兰泉和可口可乐,他们签署了协议规定,每家都只生产垄断产量的一半,这个协议有什么问题吗

耶鲁公开课 - 博弈论课程节选

One way to think about Nash equilibria is that they are self-enforcing agreements, so provided that everyone believes that everyone is going to go along with this agreement, then everyone in fact will.

我们可以这样理解纳什均衡,把它们想象成自我实施的协议,假设每个人都相信,大家都会遵守协议,那么大家就都会遵守

耶鲁公开课 - 博弈论课程节选