I'll start you off with the wrong answer and this, by the way, can be found on this web site.

我先例举几个错误的答案,这些都可以在这个网站上找到。

耶鲁公开课 - 心理学导论课程节选

We don't give ourselves the permission to be human, because we think there is something wrong with us if we experience these emotions.

我们不准许自己为人，因为我们觉得是自己有毛病,如果我们有这样的情绪。

哈佛公开课 - 幸福课课程节选

You might be able to tell just by looking at it what was - if there was a disease what was wrong with it.

也许还能看出,这个细胞是否存在病变

耶鲁公开课 - 生物医学工程探索课程节选

I don't see anything wrong with sort of fond to be even remembering passes experiences.

我不认为喜欢甚至,记住过去有什么错。

麻省理工公开课 - 电影哲学课程节选

To have a stereotype is to be-- is to have something wrong with you.

说你有刻板印象-,就是说你有问题。

耶鲁公开课 - 心理学导论课程节选

Leviticus 19:33-34: "When a stranger resides with you in your land, you shall not wrong him. The stranger who resides with you shall be to you as one of your citizens; you shall love him as yourself, for you were strangers in the land of Egypt: I, the Lord, am your God."

利未记》第19章33-34节的记录如下，若有外人在你们国中，和你同居，就不可欺负他，和你们同居的外人,你们要看他如本地人一样，并要爱他如己，因为你们,在埃及地也作过寄居的，我是耶和华你们的上帝“

耶鲁公开课 - 旧约导论课程节选

Why does an act of consent make such a moral difference, that an act that would be wrong taking a life without consent, is morally permissible with consent?

为什么征得了同意，就能在道德上如此不同呢，没有征得同意就杀人，在道德上是不允许的，征得同意就是允许的吗？

耶鲁公开课 - 公正课程节选

My argument must be wrong because it goes against the lesson of the class and the lessons of the class are gospel right, they're not wrong ever, so what's wrong with that argument? Yes, Ale Well because you have to be able to agree, you have to be able to speak to them but we aren't allowed to show our partners what we wrote.

这个说法肯定有问题,因为这和我们的结论刚好背道而驰,结论是绝对正确的,结论没错,那这个说法错在哪,艾尔,因为你必须要能够达成一致,你需要和他们谈判,但是我们不允许同伴看到我的选择

耶鲁公开课 - 博弈论课程节选

If that's the real right,then again, there'd be nothing wrong with removing the heart in D.

如果这才是对的，在D阶段摘除心脏是可以的。

耶鲁公开课 - 死亡课程节选

I want to hear now, finally, from those of you who think even with consent, even with a lottery, even with a final murmur of consent by Parker, at the very last moment, it would still be wrong.

我现在想听听，是否有人认为,即便是征得了同意，即便是有了抽签，即便派克最终还是答应了，杀死派克依然还是错误的。

耶鲁公开课 - 公正课程节选

We have to respect persons and if he earned that money fairly without violating anybody else's rights in accordance with the two principles of justice in acquisition and in justice in transfer, then it would be wrong, it would be a form of coercion to take it away.

我们必须要尊重个人,如果他公平地赚到钱,没有侵犯到他人权利,完全遵守了那两条公正原则,最初占有公正原则和转让公正原则，那么向他多征税就是错的，这无异于强取豪夺。

耶鲁公开课 - 公正课程节选