So I think it's probably obvious why it's not a good strategy for Beatrice to enter here.

参选对比阿特丽斯来说不是个好策略,的原因非常明显

耶鲁公开课 - 博弈论课程节选

Suppose Beatrice stands again, sorry Beatrice, and the gentleman in front of her whose name is?

假设比阿特丽斯再次参选,不好意思比阿特丽斯,在她前面的那位先生,名字是

耶鲁公开课 - 博弈论课程节选

Let's see what happened, so we have Beatrice and your name is Claire Elise.

我们来看看发生了什么,比阿特丽斯和你的名字是,克莱尔·伊莉斯

耶鲁公开课 - 博弈论课程节选

Conversely, If Beatrice doesn't stand and the woman who's one in from the side there, sit down a second Stacy and if this person stands, and your name is?

反过来,如果比阿特丽斯没有参选,那边的女士,斯泰西请坐,如果这个人站起来,你的名字是

耶鲁公开课 - 博弈论课程节选

So Beatrice won this election, is this array a Nash Equilibrium?

比阿特丽斯在选举中获胜获胜,这是一个纳什均衡吗

耶鲁公开课 - 博弈论课程节选

Assume I got it right and Beatrice is actually the center.

假设我是对的 比阿特丽斯是正中间

耶鲁公开课 - 博弈论课程节选

Beatrice is going to get all of these right wing votes.

比阿特丽斯将获得所有的右派选票

耶鲁公开课 - 博弈论课程节选

So we figured out that, Beatrice stand up a second.

我们发现,比阿特丽斯站起来一会

耶鲁公开课 - 博弈论课程节选

Beatrice wins anyway; it just costs Beatrice some money.

不论如何比阿特丽斯都会获胜,只会花她点钱

耶鲁公开课 - 博弈论课程节选

Beatrice is also going to get one and a half of the votes in the middle, so this vote and half the Pierson guy's vote and, I've forgotten your name already, again?

比阿特丽斯同时会获得,中间一个半的选票,这个选票和皮尔逊学院小伙子选票的一半,我忘了你的名字了,请重复一下

耶鲁公开课 - 博弈论课程节选

I apologize Beatrice won this election, I apologize.

我很抱歉,是比阿特丽斯赢了这次选举,我很抱歉

耶鲁公开课 - 博弈论课程节选

Beatrice is going to win this election.

比阿特丽斯将在这选举中获胜

耶鲁公开课 - 博弈论课程节选

so Beatrice is going to win.

所以比阿特丽斯将获胜

耶鲁公开课 - 博弈论课程节选

So here's our potential equilibrium with just Beatrice standing, and if somebody to the, which way do we do it, somebody to the right of Beatrice was to stand, so ma'am if you stand a second, and your name is?

只有比阿特丽斯参选是潜在的均衡,如果有人,我们从哪个方向演示好呢,比阿特丽斯右边的某个人参选,这位女士请站起来一下,你的名字是

耶鲁公开课 - 博弈论课程节选

If Beatrice enters she loses.

如果比阿特丽斯参选,她会失败

耶鲁公开课 - 博弈论课程节选

Beatrice won this election.

比阿特丽斯赢了这次选举

耶鲁公开课 - 博弈论课程节选