John is a mathematical economist and we both love mathematics, but maybe John is going to do more of it than I am.
约翰是个数理经济学家,我们都热爱数学,但是约翰会讲授更多关于数学的内容
It's a way of thinking about form that has more to do with individuality than it does with convention.
思考这种形式的方法,与传统习惯相比,与个性更有关系。
I want to make another, slightly more philosophical remark associated with this and it's to do with the idea of "Leadership."
第二条结论就是,我不妨说得稍带有些哲学的意味,这和领导力是紧密联系的
We transition to actually real world applications later on like a compression-- how do you take a huge amount of data ; and actually whittle it down into something more manageable; something that uses less of your disk space.
然后我们会讲生活中的应用程序,比方说压缩文件——,把大量的数据分解使其更易管理;,并占用尽量少的磁盘空间。
Now, according to sort of a simple-minded view of operant conditioning in behaviorist psychology, the children you reward should do it more.
根据简单的,行为心理学的操作性条件反射观点来看,拿到奖励的小孩应该会画更多画。
And so when you start to do this, you can now have a much more portion of your IT spending dedicated to maintenance and sustaining.
所以开始做这件事的时候,很大一部分的信息技术开销,都用于维持和维护了。
I've got a list, walk you through it an element at a time, do I look at each element of the list more than once?
你一次只能得到他的一个元素,我是不是把数组里面的每个元素,都过了大于等于一次?,你不这样认为么?大家有什么建议?
What do they do? One of the problems that it produces is the more people you have, up to a point that's good.
他们都干些什么呢,其中一个问题是,人越多,产出就越大,这在达到临界点之前是好事
It's much more a question of reminding you ; that if you can do it with this, you can do it with anything; but also of reminding you that, after all, reading--reading just anything--is a complex and potentially almost unlimited activity.
选择它主要是为了告诉你们,如果你能用理论来分析这篇,那么分析任何一篇都没问题;,还想提醒大家,阅读任何文章都是个复杂的过程,其中有无限种可能。
Very high correlation between the two which in many ways gives credence to the many years of research that has been conducted, before we have the technology to do it in a more sophisticated way.
两者有很大关联,这在很多方面,给多年来进行过的研究提供了可信度,在拥有技术进行更全面的研究之前。
That might be a good way to do it but it's going to be more of a challenge because you might - you're going to have a lot of these non-coding sequences that are in the way.
这或许是个好方法,但这会带来更大的问题,因为也许--,会有许多不编码蛋白质的序列,干扰你的筛选
Then what the program will do will give you a series of things it might potentially be because it recognizes that you could be entering more than one thing, and then you have to take the one that you think is closest to what you're actually eating.
系统就会给你,一系列它认为正确的选项,因为它可能会认为你的东西不止一种,之后你要选择,与你所吃食品最接近的选项
You actually need to kind of do this and then you can swap these two numbers but it requires 50 percent more memory.
你实际上需要这样做,然后才能交换两个数字,但是它需要多50%的内存。
And again, I'm going to do it with a little bit of abusive notation, and it's a little more complicated, but we can kind of look at. All right?
为了解决这个问题,我还是需要滥用一点符号,这有点复杂,让我们来看看吧,好不好?
So what we have to do, of course, is take it in to the lab and do this in a more systematic way with random assignment.
因此,我们必须做的是,把实验带回实验室,在随机安排下,更系统地做这个实验。
The second thing it's going to do, from a more theoretical point of view, is it's going to suggest to us that actually things aren't quite as bad we thought.
其次,它将,从一个更理论化的角度,告诉我们实际情况,并不像我们想象的那么糟
As I keep moving down, that part gets smaller, it's not always the initial length of the list, and you're right. But if you do the sums, or if you want to think of it this way, if you think about this more generally, it's always on average at least the length of the list.
等等,随着移动,剩下的部分越来越小,并不是初始那么长了,如果你算一算,或者你这么想,你考虑更一般的情况,平均下来至少是列表的长度。
From here on down, if I bothered to do it, we'd find that choosing 3 always gets me 5% more of the vote than I would have had from choosing 2, against any of these higher numbers.
如果我不怕麻烦 我能一直这么写下去,我们发现选择立场3总是比选择立场2,使我多获得5%的选票,在对手选更靠后的立场的情况下
However I do that, I know that should inherently take more time than it takes to compute the average age of all the EECS faculty.
然而我得这么做,我知道,这比计算所有EECS的教员的,平均年龄要,占用更长的时间。
应用推荐