But dualism doesn't so much offer the explanation typically as just say, "Well, maybe we'd be better off positing something immaterial."

但是二元论还没有给出,这样的解释,也许我们假设非物质的存在会好一些

耶鲁公开课 - 死亡课程节选

A lot rests on it, but as Crick points out; the scientific consensus now is that dualism is wrong.

很多人都信奉它,但正如克里克所指出的,如今的科学共识认为二元论是错误的

耶鲁公开课 - 心理学导论课程节选

The reason I think it doesn't follow trivially is because, remember, I said we're dealing with interactionist dualism.

我认为它并非自然地得出结论的原因是,记住,我们在和心物交互二元论打交道

耶鲁公开课 - 死亡课程节选

And dualism simply says, "It's all nonphysical, it's part of the ether," and hence fails to explain it.

二元论只是说,"心灵是无形的,是世界的一部分",因此并不能给出合理的解释

耶鲁公开课 - 心理学导论课程节选

And he used this argument as a way to support dualism, as a way to support the idea that bodies and minds are separate.

他用这一论据来支持二元论,来支持身心二元的观点

耶鲁公开课 - 心理学导论课程节选

So I think it's a very nice attempt to discuss the physicalist alternative to Plato's dualism.

因此我认为这是个好的尝试,讨论与二元论不同的观点。

耶鲁公开课 - 死亡课程节选

In contrast it looks, prospects don't look so promising for surviving my death of my body if we don't believe in dualism, if we're physicalists.

相反地,如果我们是物理主义者,如果我们不是二元论者,对于肉体死后人不死，就并不那么乐观了。

耶鲁公开课 - 死亡课程节选

You may choose to embrace dualism, reject the idea that the brain is responsible for mental life, and reject the promise of a scientific psychology.

你也可以选择身心二元论,拒绝承认大脑引起心理活动,看低科学心理学的前景

耶鲁公开课 - 心理学导论课程节选

So, this is known as dualism because the claim is, for humans at least, there are two separate things; there's our material bodies and there's our immaterial minds.

这便是二元论,因为它主张,至少对于人类而言,存在两种独立的成分,即有形的生理客体与无形的心理

耶鲁公开课 - 心理学导论课程节选

As always with philosophy, there's more complicated versions of dualism where maybe the interaction doesn't work both ways, but let's just limit ourselves to good, old-fashioned, two-way interactionist dualism.

但由于我们在说的是哲学,二元论还持有更为复杂的观点,例如,交互作用对双方都不起作用,但就让我们限制在一个范围内较好,保守的,双向互动二元论观点

耶鲁公开课 - 死亡课程节选

But the most articulate and well-known defender of dualism is the philosopher Rene Descartes, and Rene Descartes explicitly asked a question, "Are humans merely physical machines, merely physical things?"

但是最著名最有影响力的二元论拥护者,则非哲学家勒奈·笛卡尔莫属,勒奈·笛卡尔明确地提出了一个问题,"人类是否仅仅是生理机器,是生理客体而已"

耶鲁公开课 - 心理学导论课程节选

Why would you reject dualism in favor of this alternative?

为什么你要反对二元论而相信这个

耶鲁公开课 - 心理学导论课程节选

One thing is our dualism is enmeshed in our language.

首先,二元论镶嵌于我们的语言之中

耶鲁公开课 - 心理学导论课程节选

Our dualism shows up in intuitions about personal identity.

二元论揭示了直觉上的人格同一性

耶鲁公开课 - 心理学导论课程节选

One reason is dualism has always had its problems.

原因之一即二元论总是有自身的局限性

耶鲁公开课 - 心理学导论课程节选

Now, Descartes made two arguments for dualism.

笛卡尔为二元论提出了两点论据

耶鲁公开课 - 心理学导论课程节选

Now, dualism is a very different doctrine.

二元论则是一种截然不同的假说

耶鲁公开课 - 心理学导论课程节选

So, dualism is emmeshed.

二元论在人们心中根深蒂固

耶鲁公开课 - 心理学导论课程节选