Although I guess there have been people who've made that sort of claim, it seems false to me.

尽管我想有些人,声称他们能观察到,但我对此并不苟同

耶鲁公开课 - 死亡课程节选

I think,as far as I can see,that the claim we all die alone, however we interpret it,just ends up being implausible or false.

在我看来，说我们全都会孤独而死，无论怎样解释都是不合理的，错误的。

耶鲁公开课 - 死亡课程节选

And that claim far from being false is true.

这个结论肯定是正确的。

耶鲁公开课 - 死亡课程节选

So if that's what the claim means,it's false.

所以如果这就是对其的诠释，那它就是错的。

耶鲁公开课 - 死亡课程节选

It could be that even though the general claim, "It takes one to know one" Is false, the particular claim, "Eternal, non-physical can only be grasped by the eternal, non-physical," Maybe that particular claim is true.

即使一般来说,同类互知这个观点是错的,但它的特例,也就是永恒的非现实的东西只能被永恒的,非现实的东西所理解,这可能是对的

耶鲁公开课 - 死亡课程节选