So what I'd like to do now is focus on a piece that emphasizes--foregrounds-- just the first axis, pitch.

那么现在我要做的是集中精力于一首乐曲,它所强调的,突出的,只是这第一维,音高

耶鲁公开课 - 聆听音乐课程节选

And we hope that at the end of the class, every time you're confronted with some technical problem, one of your first instincts is going to be, "How do I write the piece of code that's going to help me solve that?"

并且我们希望到了期末，每当你要面对一些,技术问题的时候，你们的本能之一将会是：,“我怎么才能编写一个代码,来帮我解决这问题？“

麻省理工公开课 - 计算机科学及编程导论课程节选

But first we need to establish a few things about the occasion for this piece and about the genre, the literary genre of the mask in general.

但首先我们必须建立一些,关于此作品与流派，一般文学体裁《面具》的场合。

耶鲁公开课 - 弥尔顿课程节选

In broad scope, the first half of the class is going to be metaphysics, for those of you who are familiar with the philosophical piece of jargon.

广泛上讲，这门课程的前半部分，对于你们中熟悉哲学术语的人来说,将会是形而上学。

耶鲁公开课 - 死亡课程节选

Get out a piece of paper. This is your first exam.

请准备一张纸，这是你们第一次考试。

耶鲁公开课 - 新约课程节选

And similarly, particularly for those less comfortable, do we offer prior to the start of each week for a new piece at what we dub a walkthrough whereby one of the teaching fellows will literally start on the first page, give you a mental framework for the week's problems and talk about the ideas that it covers, and then walk through the piece set so that you have a roadmap of sorts that you can follow.

同样，特别对于那些不熟悉编程跟不上进度的同学，每周上课前都可以预习新的知识点,一名教师从第一页开始,对于每周的问题,都给你们简历一个心理框架,并讨论它所涵盖的思想，然后了解了每个部分之后,就可以有个学习的路线图。

哈佛公开课 - 计算机科学课程节选

Let me first ask you this, is this a reversible or in irreversible process? Right, let me add one more piece of data here which I said in words but which is actually important to write down before doing the problem.

让我先问你们，这是可逆过程,还是不可逆过程？好,让我加上一点简要的,但是很重要的前提,【p1>p2】这是可逆的吗？

麻省理工公开课 - 热力学与动力学课程节选

And so I'm going to go back to this idea of a class, and let's build the first of these, and that is shown right here on this piece of your handout.

你把半径加到一起,你不会把角度加到一起，你需要再笛卡尔坐标下，进行这个操作,那么我这里在讲的就是。

麻省理工公开课 - 计算机科学及编程导论课程节选

First one, when I write a piece of code, especially code that has branches in it, when I design test cases for that piece of code, I should try and have a specific test case for each possible path through the code.

第一点，当我们写代码的时候，尤其是一些含有分支语句的代码的时候，当我为这些代码,设计测试用例的时候，我应该为每一个可能的程序路径,都设计一个特别的用例。

麻省理工公开课 - 计算机科学及编程导论课程节选

The other great critic of the Miltonic simile for my money takes a completely different tack, and that's Geoffrey Hartman who makes an argument that might even be thought to contradict Fish's argument, although actually Geoffrey Hartman wrote his piece first.

在我看来，另一个对弥尔顿的比喻研究深远的评论家,采取了截然不同的方针，他就是杰弗里哈特曼,他做出了一个被认为是在反驳费什的观点，尽管实际上是哈特曼首先写出了他的观点。

耶鲁公开课 - 弥尔顿课程节选

So this first little piece of code right here says, ok you give me 2 points, I'll create another 1 of these lists and I'll simply take the x, sorry I shouldn't say x, I'm going to assume it's the x, the x-values are the two points, add them together, just right there, the y-values, add them together and return that list.

好，为了来认识到这一点,让我们来看一个简单的小例子，在你们的课堂手册上，你可以看到我写了一个小程序,它假设我得到了，这些点中的一些，我想对它们做一些操作，例如我想把它们加到一起，那么这里的第一小片，代码的意思是，好给我两个点，我会再创建一个数组。

麻省理工公开课 - 计算机科学及编程导论课程节选

And in fact, now let me ask those two questions about this piece of code. First question is, for what values of integers-- we're going to assume integers-- but for what values of x does this code terminate? And the second question is, for what values of x does it give me back the right answer?

实际上，让我关于这块代码问两个问题,第一个问题是，对于什么样的整数值，我们会假设是整数,对于x的什么值程序,会最终终止？第二个问题是,对于x的什么值程序,会返回正确答案？

麻省理工公开课 - 计算机科学及编程导论课程节选