How are we to understand this case ? about toleration and freedom of speech?
我们如何了解这件,关于容忍与言论自由的范例?
Why can't you, we live in a democratic society with freedom of speech.
我们生活在个有言论自由的民主社会。
How far should freedom of speech and that is to say speech that borders on, even verges into, civic impiety, ? how far should such speech be tolerated?
言论自由的界限,确切的说是临界言论,甚至是跨界谈到公民渎神的言论,这类言论的容忍界限为何?
If we're arguing about hate speech, we could talk about the balance between the rights of the freedom of speech versus the right to a certain quality of education free of harassment and humiliation.
如果我们围线仇恨言论来争辩,我们就会谈到如何平衡,言论自由的权利,与接受高等教育,不受骚扰和羞辱的权利。
My first book was on the trial of John Peter Zenger, 5 which was the first famous case in America in 1735 relating to freedom of speech.
我首本书写的就是John,Peter,Zenger审判,这个案例在1785年的美国家喻户晓5,是言论自由方面的第一个例子。
Is a healthy society ? one that is literally open to every point of view, ? freedom of speech is naturally a cherished good, ? is it the supreme good?
健全的社会,基本上就是对各种观点持开放态度吗,言论自由本质上就是好的,或它是最好?
His in other words seems to be a highly personal in many ways highly individual quest for self perfection and not a doctrine about the value of freedom of speech in general.
换言之,他崇高的个人,从许多层面来看,是他崇高的个人,追求本身完美,而非关一般,言论自由价值的学说。
He doesn't make the claim about the general utility of freedom or unlimited speech.
他并未主张自由的,一般实用或是无限言论;
应用推荐