• So that explains one of our glitches here, but we have another glitch, and that second glitch comes between nitrogen and oxygen.

    那么我们的第一种小偏差已经解释清楚了,但是我们还有另外一种,它在氮和氧之间发生。

    麻省理工公开课 - 化学原理课程节选

  • Well, there's this funny glitch here between three-month and one-year, but then it just continued to decline.

    虽然在三月到一年期债券间有个小波折,但整体趋势是向下的

    耶鲁公开课 - 金融市场课程节选

  • And the glitch that doesn't make sense just through periodic trends, is that it turns out that the ionization energy of boron is actually less than the ionization energy up beryllium.

    仅仅考虑周期性规律,是无法理解这个问题的,这里显示硼的电离能,实际上比铍的要小。

    麻省理工公开课 - 化学原理课程节选

  • So, it turns out that in this case, 2 p and any time that we see we're going from a 2 s to 2 p, filling in of electrons, we actually see that little bit of glitch in ionization energy.

    在这种情形下的结果就是,任何时候我们从,2,s,到,填充进电子,我们都会看到电离能会稍稍偏离我们的规律。

    麻省理工公开课 - 化学原理课程节选

  • So, our two glitches we see when we go from the 2 p, or from 2 s to start filling the 2 p, and then we also get another glitch when we've half-filled the 2 p, and now we're adding and having to double up in one of those p orbitals.

    因此,我们的看到的两个小偏差,一个是在开始进入,2,p,轨道,或者说在填满,2,s,轨道之后,开始填,2,p,轨道的时候出现的,另一个则是在,2,p,轨道半满之后,开始继续加电子,使得其中一个,p,轨道上的。

    麻省理工公开课 - 化学原理课程节选

$firstVoiceSent
- 来自原声例句
小调查
请问您想要如何调整此模块?

感谢您的反馈,我们会尽快进行适当修改!
进来说说原因吧 确定
小调查
请问您想要如何调整此模块?

感谢您的反馈,我们会尽快进行适当修改!
进来说说原因吧 确定