So Klawans argues that the process of sacrifice, which grants the offerer complete control over life and death, is a kind of imitatio dei.
因此克洛文认为献祭的过程,授予了实施者控制生杀的大权,实际上它就是一种对神的模仿。
they might get a certain amount of grants to help them pay their tuition.
他们也许可以拿到一定的补助金来帮助他们付学费。
He says, "They aren't authors. They're founders of discursivity," and then he grants that it's kind of difficult to distinguish between a founder of discursivity and an author who has had an important influence. Right?
他说:“他们不是作者,他们是散漫性的创始人“,然后他认为很难区分,究竟散漫性的创始人和作者,哪个的影响更重要,对吗?
应用推荐