So this isn't-- OK. And you're also close. It's going to be linear but how many times do I go through this?
每次能丢掉一半,所以这里不是-,好的,但你也很接近了,他可能是线性的,但我得遍历多少次呢?
you could characterize them in terms of how they're gated, -- and basically how they open or close -- that's one way to talk about different types.
你可以通过闸门的类型来描述它们,这基本上也就是看它们是如何打开或关闭的-,这是一种讨论不同类型的方法。
It's not--It's actually close to how linguists describe normal languages, but it's very simple.
这个例子和语言学家所描述的,正常语言非常接近,但却很简单
How close they will get remains to be seen.
至于以后关系如何还是个未知数。
Its role is to move molecules around in the body so that they're available to cells everywhere within your body regardless of how close they are to your skin, and we'll talk about that.
它能将分子输送到身体各处,供体内所有的细胞使用,而无论那些细胞多么靠近体表,我们会讲到这些的
What is this? This is a wonderful piece of abstraction. It is saying, you don't need to know squat about what's inside the body of this function. You don't have to worry about the parameter names, because they're going to be preserved, you don't need to worry about how I'm doing it, this tells you how you can use this, in order to use it correctly. Of course, I can then close it off, and off we go.
但是这能告诉你一些信息,这是什么?,这是一段完美的抽象,它的意思是你不需要知道,这个函数的内部构造,你不必担心参数是否重名,因为它们已经被预存了,你不需要担心我如何使用它,它告诉了你你该如何操作,从而正确的使用它,当然我也可以把它关掉。
So, I want to contrast that with another concept that seemed to be opposing ideas, and that is thinking about not how far away the most probable radius is, but thinking about how close an electron can get to the nucleus if it's actually in that orbital.
我要将它和另外一个,看起来相反的概念相比较,我们不是考虑,最可能半径离原子核有多远,而是考虑如果电子在那个轨道上,能多接近原子核。
So, this should be pretty straight forward, 100% let's see if we can get close to a 100% on this one, which is how many radial nodes does a 4 p orbital have?
很简单,让我们来看看这题,我们是不是可以接近%,对于一个4p轨道,它有多少个节点?,给你们10秒钟?
应用推荐