The Apology and the Crito represent a tension, they represent even a conflict between two more or less permanent and irreconcilable moral codes.

苏格拉底自辩篇》和《克里托篇》,代表着一种张力，它们甚至可说代表着两种,多少算是永恒,且无法调和的道德规范。

耶鲁公开课 - 政治哲学导论课程节选

These constitute two irreconcilable alternatives, two different callings, so to speak, and any attempt, I think, to reconcile or to synthesize these two can only lead to a deep injustice to each.

这包含了两种无法调和的准则，两种不同的召唤，可以说任何想要，调和或综合两者的意图,仅会导致双方皆产生深度的不义。

耶鲁公开课 - 政治哲学导论课程节选

Okay. So that's the basic distinction and, as I say, as far as I can see it's irreconcilable so it leaves us with a choice that really does have to be made, and it's a choice which looms over a course in literary theory and coming to understand the tradition of literary theory.

这就是二者基本的不同之处，我以前说过，只要二者不能兼容,我们就不得不从中选择一个，这个选择将会一直出现在文学理论课,和理解文学理论传统的过程中。

耶鲁公开课 - 文学理论导论课程节选