At the same time, Aristotle agrees with those who defend the thesis of natural slavery.
亚里士多德同时也赞同,那些捍卫自然奴役的论点。
Although pro-slavery writers will become deeply contemptuous of Natural Law of Natural Law doctrine as it can be applied to the possibilities of man.
虽然亲奴制的作家,会非常蔑视自然法和及其规律法则,因为它能激发人类的潜能
There are some who believe that slavery is natural, because ruling and being ruled is a pervasive distinction " that one sees all societies practice."
有些人相信,奴役是自然的演变,因为统治者与被统治者,有着普遍的区别,一方要看顾着整个社会的运作“
Slavery is natural because we cannot rule ourselves without the restraint of the passions.
奴役是自然的演变,因为我们无法管理我们自己,若无克制激情。
If slavery is natural, and if nature intends to distinguish the slave from the unfree, the free from the unfree, ? how can nature miss the mark?
如果奴役是自然的演变,而自然倾向于,将奴隶从不自由的人中区别出来,将自由从不自由中区别出来,自然如何会偏离正轨?
The first point worth noting about this, is that Aristotle did not simply assume slavery was natural, because it was practiced virtually everywhere in the ancient world.
第一点值得注意的是,亚里士多德并未,简单纯地假设奴役是自然的,只因奴役在古代的世界,四处可见。
If the latter, if this hierarchy of intelligence or this hierarchy of the rational is the result of upbringing, ? then how can slavery be defended as natural?
若是后者,即智慧的阶级制度,或说理性的阶级制度,是教养的结果,那奴役如何能以自然演变加以辩护?
Aristotle tells us that slavery is natural.
亚里士多德告诉我们奴役是自然的演变。
应用推荐