We've seen so far that we can have a neutral plus neutral sodium plus chlorine goes to cation plus anion.
到目前为止,我们得到了一个不带电的加一个不带电的,即钠加上氯,得到阳离子加阴离子。
So if we add them all up, there should be no net charge on the molecule, if the molecule is neutral.
因此如果我们把它们都加起来,这个分子上应该没有净电荷,如果这个分子是中性的话。
for why you became afraid of dogs is that one day a dog came up and he was a neutral stimulus.
你之所以害怕狗,是因为,某天有只狗向你跑来,狗是一个中性刺激。
One of the things he claims is that in a polytheistic system, which is morally neutral, where you have some primordial realm that spawns demons, monsters, gods, evil is a permanent necessity.
他所提到的一件事是,在多神体系中,道德是中立的,这里有最原始的国度,生产恶魔,怪兽,神灵和邪恶是一种永久需求。
The molecule is net neutral, but this right end is a little bit more negative and the left end is a little bit more positive.
这分子是电中性的,但右边要带一点负电荷,而左边要带一点正电荷。
Maybe Merton Miller is right-- these things are "neutral mutations" and changes in dividend policy are meaningless.
也许莫顿·米勒是对的,这些都是"中性突变",变更股利政策是无意义的
If you're a fan of the neutral container theory, you won't have anything extra to add, because life per se is just a zero.
如果你是中性容器理论的粉丝,你就没有任何额外的东西可添加,因为生活本身等于零。
So Tchaikovsky is a little bit more neutral in terms of the rhythm.
所以柴可夫斯基在节奏方面,更为平和
And it wasn't a neutral massacre.
并且那不是一场漫无目的的屠杀
Aristotle takes his stand from within politics and the regime of which he is a part. Of course we all know contemporary political scientists are not neutral. They frequently insert their views values we call them value judgments we call them.
亚里士多德的立场却是置身于,政治与政体之内,让自己成为其中的一部份,当然,我们都知道当今的政治科学,并非如此中立,他们常硬加入,他们自身的观点与价值,他们的价值判断。
So we're going to feel a higher z effective in the case of the ion compared to the neutral atom.
因此,我们在离子中,会比在中性原子中感受到更高的有效核电量。
So, let's try another example here, and let's try a case now where instead of dealing with a neutral molecule we have an ion, so we have c n minus.
那么,让我们来试一下另外一个例子,这次不是一个中性原子,而是一个离子,氰离子。
If there's no tax advantage to one over the other it is completely neutral.
两者之间不再有税赋优惠,完全中性化了
So, Kaufman says that the pagan worldview is one of an amoral universe ; Not a moral universe; not an immoral universe; but an amoral universe. It is morally neutral.
因此据考夫曼所说,异教认为,既不是道德的宇宙,也不是不道德的宇宙;,而是与道德无关的宇宙,它从道德上中立。
He said why don't we choose something neutral?
他说,为什么不选择一些中立的字体?
So, by the same logic, that means that all of our positively charged ions are, in fact, going to be smaller in terms of radius, compared to their neutral parents.
那么,按照相同的逻辑,我们所有的正离子,事实上,它们的半径都会缩小,与它们的中性母体相比。
应用推荐