I don't believe that markets are efficient and it doesn't really seem like it should be an open question.

我不相信市场是有效的,而且事实上这似乎,也不应该是一个开放式的问题。

耶鲁公开课 - 金融市场课程节选

open your textbook and put a circle around question number one.

打开你的课本，在第一个问题上画一个圈。

Would you please 实战 - SpeakingMax英语口语达人

It's an open question whether you'll believe it when this class comes to an end, but I'd be surprised if many of you believe it now.

即使到课程结束时,能否接受这个观点,依然是你们的自由,相反,你们要现在就能接受,倒是会让我感到很奇怪

耶鲁公开课 - 心理学导论课程节选

And if we also ask the positive question, then some new possibilities,new quests open up, just like they did for the researchers when they started to ask ?" no longer "why do so many individuals fail?"

如果我们也问积极问题，那就会出现新的可能性，新的探索，就像他们对研究学者所问的一样,不再问“为什么有这么多人堕落“

哈佛公开课 - 幸福课课程节选

So here's my attempt to make the question both a bit more precise, and a question that's an open question.

我正尝试,让这两个问题变得更准确,这是个开放性的问题

耶鲁公开课 - 死亡课程节选

Paradise Lost as a whole clearly wants us to believe that God has foreknowledge and it also clearly wants us to believe that we have free will, but the similes seem just as often to open up and to question the poem's doctrinal conclusions.

整体来说很清楚地是想让我们相信,上帝具有先知的能力,并且还想让我们相信人生来有自由的意志，但是这些比喻看起来只是为我们揭露,并质疑了诗歌本身的学理上的总结。

耶鲁公开课 - 弥尔顿课程节选

That's a really good question because if I open this up, why wouldn't it just reform with itself, why would it want to have this in here?

这是个很好的问题,如果我把质粒打开,为什么它不会自己合上,为什么它会与DNA片段重组呢

耶鲁公开课 - 生物医学工程探索课程节选