In those situations, you might say, and only in those situations, is it permissible to violate the precepts of ordinary morality.

在那些情势下，也可以说，仅在那些情势下，才能允许违背,寻常道德的戒律。

耶鲁公开课 - 政治哲学导论课程节选

Suppose there were a lottery, cabin boy lost, and the rest of the story unfolded, then how many people would say it was morally permissible?

假设抽签时，派克输了，接下来的故事继续展开，有多少人认为，这样在道德上就是允许的？

耶鲁公开课 - 公正课程节选

Right? And can someone who agrees with Matt say a little bit more about why a lottery would make it, in your view, morally permissible.

对吧，有没谁同意马特的说法,再来说说为什么通过抽签,让你觉得，在道德上可以接受。

耶鲁公开课 - 公正课程节选

.. All right. Good. Now I want to hear - so there are some who think it's morally permissible but only about 20%, led by Marcus.

很好，我现在想听的是-,现在有人认为这行为是道德上允许的,但只有20%的人，以马库斯为代表。

耶鲁公开课 - 公正课程节选

But so long as there is a non-arbitrary rule of law, then it's permissible.

但只要有一部非专制的法律，那这就是允许的。

耶鲁公开课 - 公正课程节选

How many would vote 'not guilty', that what they did was morally permissible?

有多少会投“无罪“，认为道德上是允许的？

耶鲁公开课 - 公正课程节选

Why does an act of consent make such a moral difference, that an act that would be wrong taking a life without consent, is morally permissible with consent?

为什么征得了同意，就能在道德上如此不同呢，没有征得同意就杀人，在道德上是不允许的，征得同意就是允许的吗？

耶鲁公开课 - 公正课程节选

.. A little grotesque but But morally permissible?

是有点怪异，但,但在道德上就是可以接受的？

耶鲁公开课 - 公正课程节选