So you think that this is a defense, this defense of private property in land... Yes, because it complicates original acquisition If you only cite the arrival of foreigners that cultivated the land.

所以你认为他是在，为土地的私人所有作辩护吗。,是的，因为这复杂化了“最初占有“原则,如果只引用外国人到来并耕种土地这一例子的话。

耶鲁公开课 - 公正课程节选

.. Yes. By Locke's definition, you can say... So maybe by Locke's definition, the Native Americans could have claimed a property right in the land itself.

是的，按照洛克的定义，你可以说。,也许按照洛克的定义，印第安人可以宣称拥有对该土地的财产权。

耶鲁公开课 - 公正课程节选

For example, you can't acquire a land that is common property, so people in terms of the American Indians, I feel like they already have civilizations themselves and they were using land in common.

比如，你不能掠夺公共财产，对于印第安人来说，我觉得他们已经有了自己的文明,他们用的就是公共土地。

耶鲁公开课 - 公正课程节选

There is a way Locke argues to create property, not just in the things we gather and hunt, but in the land itself, provided there is enough and as good left for others.

洛克认为有种创造财富的办法，不仅包括我们采集捕猎到的东西，还有土地本身，只要还有足够多足够好的留给别人。

耶鲁公开课 - 公正课程节选