-
Libertarian wants to say we have an absolute property right in ourselves and therefore, we can do with ourselves whatever we want.
自由主义者认为我们对自身拥有绝对所有权,因此，我们能做任何自己想做的事。
-
But at some point you have to understand that the benefits of redistribution of wealth don't justify the initial violation of the property right.
但某种程度上说，你得明白,财富重新分配的好处,并不能为侵犯财产权正名。
-
Nature gave each individual the right to life, liberty, property, and nobody could take these away legitimately.
自然赋予每个个体以,生命权,自由权和财产权,没有人有权力剥夺
-
The atoms or molecules in the gas don't know that there are other atoms and molecules in the gas, and then you end up with this universal property. All right, so gases that have this universal property, even when the pressure is not zero, those are the ideal gases.
可以忽略,这样就得到了理想气体的性质,在有限压强下,依然能保持这些性质的气体，被称为理想气体，本课中我们把大部分气体，都作为理想气体来处理。
-
When it cuts it leaves sticky ends or un-base paired single stranded regions on each end of the part its cut and that's just a property of many restriction enzymes; not all, some cut blunt,just right down the middle.
它切割后会留下两个粘性末端,或者未配对的单链部分,这是许多限制性内切酶的特性,但不是全部,有些限制性内切酶是从中间钝切的
-
Again, the elite in Britain were scared, because you've got all these Ranter groups and Levelers and people who believe that everybody ought to have the right to vote, whether they have property or not and people that believe in the right of women.
英国的精英们被吓得要死,英国当时有各种喧骚派团体,平均主义者以及民众,他们相信每个人都应该享有投票的权力,不论贫富,还有人认为妇女也应有投票权
-
John Locke said private property arises because when we mix our labor with things, unowned things, we come to aquire a property right in those things.
约翰·洛克说，私有财产权之所以兴起,是因为我们将劳动付诸于无主的事物，所以取得了这些东西的产权。
-
.. Yes. By Locke's definition, you can say... So maybe by Locke's definition, the Native Americans could have claimed a property right in the land itself.
是的，按照洛克的定义，你可以说。,也许按照洛克的定义，印第安人可以宣称拥有对该土地的财产权。
-
God has a bigger property right in us, a prior property right.
上帝更有权拥有我们，是种至高无上的权利。
-
He is clear about that. But then he goes on to say, and that's the natural right to property.
他非常明确这点，但之后他又说，而且财产权是自然权利。
-
That was the whole reason for entering society in the first place, to protect the right to property.
这就是当初人们加入社会的初衷，为了保护财产权。
-
The right to property is a natural right in the sense that it is prepolitical.
财产权某种意义上可以说是,先于政治的自然权利。
-
And his basic rights were seen to be absolute, for nothing must interfere with the right of each individual to defend his life, liberty, and property.
人的基本权利被视作每个个体都绝对拥有的,任何事物都无法干涉的,自卫,自由,财产的权利
-
Why is the fundamental right to religious liberty different from the right Alex asserts as a fundamental right to private property and to keep what I earn?
为什么宗教信仰权这一基本权利,不同于亚历克斯主张的,私有财产权，和保有自己财产的基本权利？
-
It's natural in the sense that we have a fundamental unalienable right that there be property, that the institution of property exist and be respected by the government.
自然权利是说财产权是基本的不可剥夺的,正因为它是这样的权利，所以有产权制度存在，并被政府所尊重。
-
And when Locke speaks about the right to property, he often uses that as a kind of global term for the whole category, the right to life, liberty, and property.
洛克所说的所有权，通常概括了所有的自然权利，即生命，自由和财产权。
-
How can there be a right to private property even before there is any government?
但私有财产权利怎么能在,政府建立之前就产生呢？
-
So even once the majority is in charge, the majority can't violate your inalienable rights, can't violate your fundamental right to life, liberty, and property.
所以即使多数人掌权，多数人也不能侵犯你不可剥夺的权利，不能侵犯你基本的生命，自由和财产权。
-
But what about the part of 138, if you keep reading, "Men, therefore, in society having property, they have such a right to the goods, " which by the law of the community are theirs."
但继续读下去，138节后面部分又如何呢，“因此，在社会中享有财产权的人们，对于那些根据社会的法律，是属于他们的财产，就享有这样一种权利“
-
Why? Because the labor is the unquestionable property of the laborer " and therefore, no one but the laborer can have a right to what is joined to or mixed with his labor.
为什么，因为劳动是劳动者无可争议的所有物,《政府论》第五章，“论财产“,因此除这名劳动者以外,对他施加或掺进劳动的所有物，别人没有所有权。
-
If the right to private property is natural, not conventional, if it's something that we acquire even before we agree to government, How does that right constrain what a legitimate government can do?
如果私有财产是与生俱来的，而非约定俗成，如果这是在我们同意组建政府前就拥有的，这个权利又如何能限制合法政府的行为呢？
-
This idea that no law can violate our right to life, liberty, and property would seem to support the idea of a government so limited that it would gladden the heart of the libertarian after all.
任何法律都不能侵犯生命自由和财产权的观点,似乎是支持“有限政府“这一观点的,这点无疑很讨自由主义者欢心。
应用推荐