• He says that people who put forward views like this and at any rate harmony can certainly be destroyed.

    他说提出有人,提出类似这种观点,和声当然可以毁灭。

    耶鲁公开课 - 死亡课程节选

  • Let's say that you and your co-workers are trying to make a decision about whether to put a plan forward.

    假如你和你的同事正在讨论是否需要推进一个计划。

    It depends on 课堂 - SpeakingMax英语口语达人

  • But I think this is fairly faithful to the kind of argument he means to put forward.

    但是我认为这样相当忠实于,他想要推进的论证。

    耶鲁公开课 - 死亡课程节选

  • And then I gonna ask you to begin to design an approach, give me some recommendations that we can take forward and put into the new courses that we are gonna be developing.

    然后我会让你们,构思一种方式,希望你们给我一些,能够实施的建议,并将其运用于,我们正在开发的新课程。

    麻省理工公开课 - 媒体、教育、市场课程节选

  • And in the eighteenth and nineteenth centuries this progression was viewed as an advance, which is not very surprising because the whole theory was put forward by scholars who were basically western monotheists.

    在十八十九世纪,这个演变,被认为是一种进步,这并不奇怪,因为整个理论基本上都是由,西方一神论者提出的。

    耶鲁公开课 - 旧约导论课程节选

  • I want you to be able to put your best foot forward.

    我希望你能很好的进步。

    麻省理工公开课 - 固态化学导论课程节选

  • and they put a very simple idea forward, it captures my attention and I continue thinking about it.

    他们提出一个很简单的想法,吸引了我的注意力,让我一直思考着它。

    对于未来的技术 - SpeakingMax英语口语达人

  • So the first argument, that's a straight forward argument, the second argument says, I put myself in other peoples shoes, I realize they're not going to play a dominated strategy, and therefore, having realized they're not going to play a dominated strategy, I shouldn't play a strategy between 45 and 67.

    所以第一个过程是直截了当地,而第二个过程,我从别人的角度思考,发现他们并不会选择劣势策略,意识到他们并不会选择劣势策略后,我也不应该选择45至67的数

    耶鲁公开课 - 博弈论课程节选

  • One comes across it periodically. Within the last year, a member of our law school here put forward this very argument and said he thought it was a good one.

    就在去年,我校法学院的一名成员就提出了,同样是这个论点并加之褒奖。

    耶鲁公开课 - 死亡课程节选

  • You've got to show not only have you understood the ideas that have been put forward in the readings and in the lectures and so forth, but you see how to sort of put them together in the paper in a way that shows you've got some aptitude here.

    不只是表现出你们理解了那些概念,那些阅读中的课堂上的及其他的内容,你们还得想办法在论文中把他们组合起来,要显得有点天分。

    耶鲁公开课 - 死亡课程节选

  • But there's one other complication that you've got to be warned about, which is this. Because these are dialogues and they take the form of philosophical arguments, people put forward views and then, over the course of the discussion, change their minds about things.

    但是,还有一个地方,我要提醒你们,那就是,由于这些是对话作品,且它们全都采用了哲学论证的形式,即,人们先提出观点,然后,在讨论的过程中,改变自己的关于事物想法

    耶鲁公开课 - 死亡课程节选

  • Although this is a form of an argument that Plato does put forward in other dialogues as well, and so it strikes me so there's at least some reason to think this is an argument that he felt might well be right.

    由于这个型相的论点,柏拉图在其他的对话录里也提到过,所以这令我觉得他可能,觉得这个论点可以成立

    耶鲁公开课 - 死亡课程节选

$firstVoiceSent
- 来自原声例句
小调查
请问您想要如何调整此模块?

感谢您的反馈,我们会尽快进行适当修改!
进来说说原因吧 确定
小调查
请问您想要如何调整此模块?

感谢您的反馈,我们会尽快进行适当修改!
进来说说原因吧 确定