Given the thesis about recycling, then, we have reason to believe the soul will continue to exist after we break.

如果循环观点是正确的,那么我们有理由相信,灵魂会在我们消亡之后继续存在

耶鲁公开课 - 死亡课程节选

I'm interested in nonaqueous electrochemistry, so molten salts and polymers, the applied research. First of all, interested in environmentally sound technologies for extraction, refining, recycling of metals.

我对非水溶剂电化学感兴趣，还有熔盐和聚合物，以及应用性研究，首先，对环保型技术提取感兴趣,如金属的提取和精炼，以及循环回收。

麻省理工公开课 - 固态化学导论课程节选

Even if recycling takes place, we don't have any good reason yet to believe that the soul is one of the recycled parts.

即使循环的确发生了,我们并没有很好的理由来相信,灵魂就是一个循环的部件

耶鲁公开课 - 死亡课程节选

So it seems to me "The argument from recycling," as I call it, is not successful either.

在我看来循环观点,也是不成功的

耶鲁公开课 - 死亡课程节选

Remember the argument from recycling says when you build something, you build it out of parts.

源于轮回的论证是说,你建造某种东西的时候，你通过许多的部分建造。

耶鲁公开课 - 死亡课程节选

I call the second argument "The argument from recycling"-- not the best label I suppose, but I've never been able to come up with a better one.

我把第二个观点称为"循环观点",可能这不是最好的名称,但是我没有想到更好的

耶鲁公开课 - 死亡课程节选

So even though it's true that some kind of recycling takes place, we can't conclude that everything that's now a part of me will continue to exist afterwards.

即使有一些部件会被循环利用,但我们不能断定,组成我们身体的每一部件都会死后永存

耶鲁公开课 - 死亡课程节选

Well, there's a problem with the argument from recycling, and it's this.

然而循环观点,有一个问题,就是说

耶鲁公开课 - 死亡课程节选

Hence, the name, that I dub the argument, "The argument from recycling."

因此我美其名曰,循环观点

耶鲁公开课 - 死亡课程节选

So Plato's certainly right about recycling as a fundamental truth.

所以柏拉图谈到,万物循环利用肯定是对的

耶鲁公开课 - 死亡课程节选

The engine is a prior existing part, so can we conclude then that from the fact that argument from recycling, cars get reused, get rebuilt, when cars get destroyed, its parts is still around.

发动机是之前就存在的一个部分，所以我们可否得出结论说,根据源于轮回的论证，汽车重复使用，重新组装,汽车坏了的话，它的零件还在。

耶鲁公开课 - 死亡课程节选

But very nicely, is quite elegent structure this point, Socrates puts toghther the two arguments that we just been rehearsing, the argument from recollection and the argument that came before that, the one that I dubbed the argument from recycling.

但是这一观点的结构非常精妙,苏格拉底把我们刚才演练的,两个论证放在一块，即源于记忆的论证,和在此之前的论证，就是被我称作源于轮回的论证。

耶鲁公开课 - 死亡课程节选

Can we conclude from the argument from recycling and the fact that the engine is a prior existing part from which the car was built, that the engine will continue to exist forever after the destruction of the car.

能否根据源于轮回的论证以及,发动机是汽车成形之前就,已经存在的部分这一事实，得出结论说发动机能够在,汽车毁掉后还继续永远存在。

耶鲁公开课 - 死亡课程节选

Hence, recycling.

这就是循环

耶鲁公开课 - 死亡课程节选