Redistribution is a - if you think about it, says the libertarian is a kind of coercion.

仔细想想，再分配这个概念，按自由主义者的话来说，就是强迫。

耶鲁公开课 - 公正课程节选

For me, it's land. Land redistribution,

要是我的话，是土地方面的。土地要重新分配，

要学习环境法 - SpeakingMax英语口语达人

But at some point you have to understand that the benefits of redistribution of wealth don't justify the initial violation of the property right.

但某种程度上说，你得明白,财富重新分配的好处,并不能为侵犯财产权正名。

耶鲁公开课 - 公正课程节选

Now, how many agree with that argument, agree with the libertarian argument that redistribution for the sake of trying to help the poor is wrong?

有多少人同意自由主义者的这一驳论，认为为了帮助穷人,进行财富再分配不对？

耶鲁公开课 - 公正课程节选

I want to go back to the arguments for and against the redistribution of income.

我想继续回到对收入再分配问题,赞同与否的论辩。

耶鲁公开课 - 公正课程节选

Remember Michael Jordan, Bill Gates, the libertarian objection to taxation for redistribution?

迈克尔·乔丹，比尔·盖茨的例子中，自由主义反对通过征税进行财富再分配？

耶鲁公开课 - 公正课程节选

But let's go back now to the arguments about redistribution.

不过，我们回头来看看关于再分配的争论。

耶鲁公开课 - 公正课程节选

What's wrong with the libertarian case against redistribution?

自由主义者反对再分配怎么不对了？

耶鲁公开课 - 公正课程节选

And that's why redistribution is wrong.

正因如此，再分配是错误的。

耶鲁公开课 - 公正课程节选

Is there anyone who thinks that Locke does give grounds for opposing taxation for redistribution?

有人认为洛克确实为反对通过征税进行财富再分配,提供了理论基础吗？

耶鲁公开课 - 公正课程节选

So you're worried that if there isn't some degree of redistribution of some or left at the bottom, there will be no genuine equality of opportunity.

所以你担心,如果没有一定程度的再分配,照顾社会底层，就不会有名副其实的机会均等。

耶鲁公开课 - 公正课程节选

The libertarian's argument against redistribution begins with this fundamental idea that we own ourselves.

自由主义者反对再分配的论断,始于人人自主这一基本理念。

耶鲁公开课 - 公正课程节选