-
The U.S. Is actually an important country for regulation because it has been a model for much of the regulations around the world.
在监管方面,美国确实是一个重要的国家,美国的监管制度已成为各国的模板
-
The only reason I believe that we have financial markets that work is because we have regulations.
之所以我相信金融市场能够,维持良好运转的唯一原因,就是金融监管的存在
-
Now, you may know that New York City and other places around the country have enacted regulations to stop Trans fats being served in restaurants.
你们可能知道,纽约市和国内某些地方,颁布了卫生条例,禁止餐馆使用反式脂肪
-
They make laws but the laws are not binding on anyone, they're just suggested laws or regulations.
他们编制法规,但是却没有强制意义,他们只是对法规或者监管进行建议
-
I'm going to give a kind of a history of financial regulations in the United States that makes it rather a simple story.
我要讲讲美国金融监管史上的一些要点,我们长话短说
-
I'm going to talk primarily about U.S. Regulations and give a little history of them.
首先,我想谈谈美国的监管,讲讲历史
-
A lot of people in the financial community are annoyed by them because these regulations are costly to comply with and they take a lot of resources.
很多金融界人士对其烦不胜烦,因为执行规范条例的成本很高,一旦执行,占用太多资源
-
It's an international effort to recommend regulations for countries all over the world.
向世界各国推行监管制度,是个全球性的努力目标
-
We have historically developed regulations that deal with these problems.
有关机构已经制定了,处理这类问题的监管方法
-
We need--and there's a lot of talk in Congress right now -we need to think about new regulations that protect individuals, much like the regulations that the HOLC and the FHA made.
现在国会里有很多人都在讨论这个问题,我们需要思考关于,能用来保护个人权益的新法规,像房主贷款公司和联邦住宅管理局的制度
-
It rankles, but on the other hand, these regulations survive because the reality is that people are victimized all the time and we can't just allow companies to act in secrecy.
这让人不爽,但是从另一个角度,金融监管制度之所以长期存在,是因为现实中,大众一直都是牺牲品,我们不能任由那些公司在幕后操纵
-
This is just an example of their regulations.
这就是监管制度中的一个例子
-
They have lots of maybe good-- maybe it's not because they're irrational, it's that they're political or they're constrained by tradition or laws or regulations, all sorts of things; but, they're not holding the tangency portfolio.
他们有很多好的原因-,也许并不是因为他们不够理性，而是由于他们有自己政治上的考虑,或者是他们本身被传统,法律以及规则等一系列的因素，所限制;,因此他们不会持有切线资产组合。
应用推荐